French vs Lumbee Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 88,440,317 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Lumbee within French communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.482. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in French within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.023% in Lumbee. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 French corresponds to an increase of 23.0 Lumbee.

When considering income, the most significant differences between French and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($93,665 compared to $60,305, a difference of 55.3%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($99,824 compared to $65,113, a difference of 53.3%), and median household income ($83,468 compared to $54,644, a difference of 52.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($38,457 compared to $32,500, a difference of 18.3%), median earnings ($46,296 compared to $36,876, a difference of 25.6%), and median male earnings ($55,350 compared to $41,715, a difference of 32.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between French and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.7% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 113.9%), family poverty (8.3% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 105.9%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (15.8% compared to 31.9%, a difference of 101.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (30.7% compared to 43.2%, a difference of 41.0%), single female poverty (22.2% compared to 33.0%, a difference of 48.5%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.7% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 50.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between French and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.2% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 69.1%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.9% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 63.7%), and male unemployment (5.0% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 37.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 4.0%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.7% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 4.6%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.3% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 7.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between French and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (42.1% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 36.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 18.1%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.9% compared to 56.8%, a difference of 12.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 78.3%, a difference of 8.2%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.2% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 8.7%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.0% compared to 77.0%, a difference of 9.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between French and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.0% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 51.6%), births to unmarried women (33.4% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 44.2%), and currently married (48.4% compared to 39.8%, a difference of 21.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.8% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 0.37%), family households (64.0% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 1.6%), and family households with children (26.7% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between French and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 38.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.9% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 26.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.4% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 8.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.7% compared to 89.7%, a difference of 3.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.8% compared to 55.9%, a difference of 7.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.4% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 8.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between French and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.2% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 72.5%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 68.5%), and master's degree (14.4% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 55.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.070%), kindergarten (98.6% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.10%), and 1st grade (98.6% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.10%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between French and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.3% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 44.3%), ambulatory disability (6.6% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 43.5%), and disability age 35 to 64 (12.7% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 39.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (6.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 2.6%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.9% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 5.8%), and hearing disability (3.8% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 9.4%).