Kiowa vs Lumbee Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 33,876,302 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Lumbee within Kiowa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 1.000. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Kiowa within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.748% in Lumbee. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Kiowa corresponds to an increase of 748.2 Lumbee.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Kiowa and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($44,733 compared to $34,584, a difference of 29.3%), householder income over 65 years ($51,140 compared to $40,550, a difference of 26.1%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($74,776 compared to $60,305, a difference of 24.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($34,074 compared to $32,500, a difference of 4.8%), median earnings ($39,232 compared to $36,876, a difference of 6.4%), and median male earnings ($45,094 compared to $41,715, a difference of 8.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Kiowa and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.3% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 60.1%), receiving food stamps (14.9% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 54.1%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (21.3% compared to 31.9%, a difference of 49.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (29.2% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 6.2%), single mother poverty (35.5% compared to 43.2%, a difference of 21.9%), and single female poverty (26.9% compared to 33.0%, a difference of 22.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Kiowa and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.7% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 74.6%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.0% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 71.6%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.4% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 52.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (5.8% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 2.9%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.6% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 3.9%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.8% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Kiowa and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.2% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 20.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.2% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 11.7%), and in labor force | age > 16 (62.4% compared to 56.8%, a difference of 10.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (79.2% compared to 77.0%, a difference of 2.8%), in labor force | age 30-34 (79.8% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 3.3%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (78.3% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Kiowa and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.1% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 27.5%), divorced or separated (14.5% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 14.2%), and births to unmarried women (43.1% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 11.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (2.8% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 0.40%), average family size (3.27 compared to 3.32, a difference of 1.5%), and family households (61.4% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Kiowa and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 41.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.5% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 18.6%), and no vehicles in household (11.5% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 11.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.6% compared to 89.7%, a difference of 1.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.9% compared to 55.9%, a difference of 3.7%), and no vehicles in household (11.5% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 11.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Kiowa and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 35.7%), professional degree (3.1% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 25.2%), and master's degree (10.8% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 16.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4th grade (98.0% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.0%), 2nd grade (98.3% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.040%), and 5th grade (97.9% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.040%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Kiowa and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (8.8% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 18.8%), ambulatory disability (8.6% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 10.8%), and disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 9.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (15.8% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 0.16%), self-care disability (3.0% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 0.36%), and disability (15.6% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 0.45%).