Chickasaw vs Lumbee Community Comparison
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Lumbee
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Chickasaw
Lumbee
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,002
SOCIAL INDEX
17.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
276th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Lumbee Integration in Chickasaw Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,230,616 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Lumbee within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.116. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.099% in Lumbee. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to an increase of 99.3 Lumbee.
Chickasaw vs Lumbee Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($53,732 compared to $40,550, a difference of 32.5%), householder income under 25 years ($44,763 compared to $34,584, a difference of 29.4%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($77,929 compared to $60,305, a difference of 29.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($34,414 compared to $32,500, a difference of 5.9%), median earnings ($40,672 compared to $36,876, a difference of 10.3%), and median male earnings ($47,832 compared to $41,715, a difference of 14.7%).
Income Metric | Chickasaw | Lumbee |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $36,475 | Tragic $29,845 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $85,356 | Tragic $68,679 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $70,005 | Tragic $54,644 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $40,672 | Tragic $36,876 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $47,832 | Tragic $41,715 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $34,414 | Tragic $32,500 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $44,763 | Tragic $34,584 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $77,929 | Tragic $60,305 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $82,193 | Tragic $65,113 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $53,732 | Tragic $40,550 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.2% | Exceptional 21.3% |
Chickasaw vs Lumbee Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (13.1% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 75.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 69.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 69.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (34.4% compared to 43.2%, a difference of 25.6%), single female poverty (26.3% compared to 33.0%, a difference of 25.7%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.5% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 26.9%).
Poverty Metric | Chickasaw | Lumbee |
Poverty | Tragic 14.7% | Tragic 21.9% |
Families | Tragic 10.8% | Tragic 17.0% |
Males | Tragic 13.5% | Tragic 20.2% |
Females | Tragic 15.9% | Tragic 23.5% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 24.5% | Tragic 31.1% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 17.0% | Tragic 26.3% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 21.8% | Tragic 33.3% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.5% | Tragic 31.0% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 19.8% | Tragic 31.9% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 19.6% | Tragic 30.7% |
Single Males | Tragic 16.3% | Tragic 25.2% |
Single Females | Tragic 26.3% | Tragic 33.0% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 19.0% | Tragic 28.5% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 34.4% | Tragic 43.2% |
Married Couples | Tragic 5.8% | Tragic 8.3% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Good 10.7% | Tragic 18.1% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.6% | Tragic 19.7% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.1% | Tragic 22.9% |
Chickasaw vs Lumbee Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.3% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 83.2%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.7% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 66.7%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.0% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 53.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.7% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.87%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.9%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.3% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 3.9%).
Unemployment Metric | Chickasaw | Lumbee |
Unemployment | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 6.4% |
Males | Excellent 5.2% | Tragic 6.9% |
Females | Excellent 5.1% | Tragic 5.9% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.2% | Tragic 13.3% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.7% | Tragic 19.1% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.9% | Tragic 12.0% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Fair 6.7% | Tragic 11.2% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.2% | Tragic 7.1% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 4.9% | Tragic 5.4% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Tragic 4.6% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Good 4.8% | Fair 4.9% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.4% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.3% | Tragic 13.5% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 9.0% | Tragic 13.8% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.6% | Tragic 9.3% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Good 5.4% | Tragic 7.1% |
Chickasaw vs Lumbee Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 23.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 13.6%), and in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 56.8%, a difference of 9.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 78.3%, a difference of 4.5%), in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 4.5%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (80.9% compared to 77.0%, a difference of 5.1%).
Labor Participation Metric | Chickasaw | Lumbee |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 62.3% | Tragic 56.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 76.2% | Tragic 70.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.3% | Tragic 31.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Poor 74.5% | Tragic 65.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 81.9% | Tragic 78.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 81.9% | Tragic 77.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 80.9% | Tragic 77.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 79.0% | Tragic 75.6% |
Chickasaw vs Lumbee Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 32.8%), single mother households (7.0% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 29.2%), and currently married (46.6% compared to 39.8%, a difference of 17.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (2.8% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 0.97%), family households (64.4% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 2.1%), and average family size (3.19 compared to 3.32, a difference of 4.1%).
Family Structure Metric | Chickasaw | Lumbee |
Family Households | Good 64.4% | Tragic 63.1% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.2% | Tragic 26.3% |
Married-couple Households | Fair 45.9% | Tragic 39.6% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.19 | Exceptional 3.32 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.8% | Tragic 2.8% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.0% | Tragic 9.1% |
Currently Married | Average 46.6% | Tragic 39.8% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 14.2% | Tragic 12.7% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 36.3% | Tragic 48.2% |
Chickasaw vs Lumbee Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 31.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 18.1%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 55.9%, a difference of 5.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 89.7%, a difference of 2.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 4.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 55.9%, a difference of 5.6%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Chickasaw | Lumbee |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.9% | Average 10.3% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.3% | Average 89.7% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 59.0% | Good 55.9% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.2% | Exceptional 23.1% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.4% | Exceptional 8.8% |
Chickasaw vs Lumbee Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 38.6%), professional degree (3.4% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 36.5%), and master's degree (11.4% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 23.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 5th grade (97.9% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.020%), 4th grade (98.0% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.030%), and 6th grade (97.6% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.050%).
Education Level Metric | Chickasaw | Lumbee |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.7% | Exceptional 1.5% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.5% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.5% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.5% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.4% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.3% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Exceptional 98.0% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Exceptional 97.8% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Exceptional 97.6% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.7% | Exceptional 96.6% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.4% | Excellent 96.0% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.5% | Tragic 94.4% |
10th Grade | Excellent 94.1% | Tragic 91.7% |
11th Grade | Fair 92.3% | Tragic 88.9% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 90.3% | Tragic 85.7% |
High School Diploma | Poor 88.4% | Tragic 83.6% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 83.8% | Tragic 80.0% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 60.4% | Tragic 54.2% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 53.3% | Tragic 48.9% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 38.6% | Tragic 34.1% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 30.4% | Tragic 24.8% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.4% | Tragic 9.3% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.4% | Tragic 2.5% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Tragic 1.1% |
Chickasaw vs Lumbee Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 29.1%), disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 20.6%), and ambulatory disability (8.0% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 18.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (15.1% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 0.74%), disability (15.2% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 2.3%), and cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 3.4%).
Disability Metric | Chickasaw | Lumbee |
Disability | Tragic 15.2% | Tragic 15.5% |
Males | Tragic 15.1% | Tragic 15.2% |
Females | Tragic 15.2% | Tragic 15.8% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.7% | Tragic 1.3% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.8% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 9.0% | Tragic 7.4% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 16.1% | Tragic 17.6% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 30.2% | Tragic 32.7% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 51.2% | Tragic 56.2% |
Vision | Tragic 3.2% | Tragic 3.4% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.5% | Tragic 4.1% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.5% | Tragic 19.1% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.0% | Tragic 9.5% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.9% | Tragic 3.0% |