Immigrants from Middle Africa vs Lumbee Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 65,032,983 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Lumbee within Immigrant from Middle Africa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.235. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Middle Africa within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.022% in Lumbee. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Middle Africa corresponds to an increase of 21.6 Lumbee.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($58,375 compared to $40,550, a difference of 44.0%), median household income ($77,559 compared to $54,644, a difference of 41.9%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($91,293 compared to $65,113, a difference of 40.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (22.4% compared to 21.3%, a difference of 4.9%), median female earnings ($37,965 compared to $32,500, a difference of 16.8%), and median earnings ($43,416 compared to $36,876, a difference of 17.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (12.7% compared to 25.2%, a difference of 98.2%), single father poverty (15.6% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 82.1%), and receiving food stamps (12.9% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 77.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (22.1% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 40.6%), single mother poverty (30.3% compared to 43.2%, a difference of 42.6%), and single female poverty (22.3% compared to 33.0%, a difference of 48.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.1% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 70.8%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.6% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 70.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.3% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 62.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.1% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 1.5%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 4.6%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 5.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.9% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 28.9%), in labor force | age > 16 (67.7% compared to 56.8%, a difference of 19.4%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (76.6% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 17.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 78.3%, a difference of 8.6%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 10.2%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.2% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 10.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (34.9% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 37.9%), single mother households (7.7% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 17.8%), and single father households (2.5% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 11.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.7% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 0.43%), family households (61.9% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 1.9%), and average family size (3.25 compared to 3.32, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 51.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 27.0%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (53.4% compared to 55.9%, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.9% compared to 89.7%, a difference of 0.15%), no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 1.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (53.4% compared to 55.9%, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 73.7%), professional degree (4.2% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 70.8%), and no schooling completed (2.4% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 58.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (94.2% compared to 94.4%, a difference of 0.15%), kindergarten (97.6% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.89%), and 1st grade (97.6% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.90%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in ambulatory disability (5.9% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 61.2%), vision disability (2.2% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 54.6%), and hearing disability (2.8% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 48.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.6% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 3.0%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.9% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 5.2%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.9% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 7.4%).