Turkish vs Lumbee Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 71,413,209 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Lumbee within Turkish communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.663. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Turks within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.060% in Lumbee. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Turks corresponds to an increase of 60.0 Lumbee.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Turkish and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($110,318 compared to $60,305, a difference of 82.9%), median household income ($99,389 compared to $54,644, a difference of 81.9%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($117,814 compared to $65,113, a difference of 80.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.7% compared to 21.3%, a difference of 29.9%), median female earnings ($44,695 compared to $32,500, a difference of 37.5%), and median earnings ($53,919 compared to $36,876, a difference of 46.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Turkish and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.5% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 141.7%), child poverty among boys under 16 (13.6% compared to 31.9%, a difference of 135.0%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (13.4% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 131.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.5% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 59.3%), single mother poverty (26.4% compared to 43.2%, a difference of 63.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 69.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Turkish and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.0% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 96.0%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 81.4%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.6% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 56.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.9% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 3.6%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 3.7%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.3% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 8.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Turkish and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 56.8%, a difference of 16.5%), in labor force | age 16-19 (35.4% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 14.3%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.3% compared to 70.6%, a difference of 13.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.6% compared to 78.3%, a difference of 9.3%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.1% compared to 77.0%, a difference of 10.5%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.8% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 10.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Turkish and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (27.4% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 75.6%), single mother households (5.5% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 66.2%), and single father households (2.0% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 40.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.6% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 0.92%), family households with children (27.4% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 4.3%), and average family size (3.16 compared to 3.32, a difference of 4.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Turkish and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 50.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.4% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 25.5%), and no vehicles in household (11.7% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 13.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.4% compared to 89.7%, a difference of 1.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.3% compared to 55.9%, a difference of 2.9%), and no vehicles in household (11.7% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 13.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Turkish and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.2% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 152.1%), doctorate degree (2.7% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 144.8%), and master's degree (19.9% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 114.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 6th grade (97.5% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.090%), 5th grade (97.7% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.10%), and 7th grade (96.7% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 0.13%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Turkish and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (9.7% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 82.9%), vision disability (1.9% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 77.6%), and ambulatory disability (5.5% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 74.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.9% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 13.0%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 19.2%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.2% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 20.6%).