Ethiopian vs Lumbee Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 67,125,967 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Lumbee within Ethiopian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.441. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ethiopians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.009% in Lumbee. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ethiopians corresponds to an increase of 9.5 Lumbee.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Ethiopian and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($89,640 compared to $54,644, a difference of 64.0%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($96,824 compared to $60,305, a difference of 60.6%), and householder income over 65 years ($64,989 compared to $40,550, a difference of 60.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (21.8% compared to 21.3%, a difference of 2.4%), median female earnings ($43,243 compared to $32,500, a difference of 33.1%), and median earnings ($49,572 compared to $36,876, a difference of 34.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ethiopian and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (11.2% compared to 25.2%, a difference of 125.3%), receiving food stamps (10.6% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 115.9%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.4% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 111.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.2% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 54.0%), single mother poverty (27.7% compared to 43.2%, a difference of 56.0%), and married-couple family poverty (5.1% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 63.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ethiopian and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 103.2%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.1% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 83.5%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.6% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 56.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.0% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 2.9%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 4.8%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.0% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ethiopian and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.2% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 23.5%), in labor force | age > 16 (69.3% compared to 56.8%, a difference of 22.1%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.3% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 18.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (86.2% compared to 78.3%, a difference of 10.0%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.9% compared to 77.0%, a difference of 11.6%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (86.6% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 12.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ethiopian and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (29.8% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 61.5%), single mother households (6.5% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 40.2%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 15.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.24 compared to 3.32, a difference of 2.6%), family households (61.2% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 2.9%), and family households with children (27.6% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 5.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ethiopian and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 52.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.9% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 29.4%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (53.1% compared to 55.9%, a difference of 5.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.6% compared to 89.7%, a difference of 0.18%), no vehicles in household (10.5% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 1.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (53.1% compared to 55.9%, a difference of 5.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ethiopian and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.4% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 117.5%), doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 115.7%), and master's degree (18.0% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 94.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (94.4% compared to 94.4%, a difference of 0.030%), 2nd grade (97.5% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.88%), and kindergarten (97.6% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.90%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ethiopian and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in ambulatory disability (5.4% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 77.9%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 71.7%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.5% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 68.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.9% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 6.7%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 17.1%), and disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 18.2%).