Brazilian vs Lumbee Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 76,089,554 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Lumbee within Brazilian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.273. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Brazilians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.006% in Lumbee. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Brazilians corresponds to a decrease of 6.5 Lumbee.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($98,267 compared to $60,305, a difference of 62.9%), median household income ($88,934 compared to $54,644, a difference of 62.7%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($104,408 compared to $65,113, a difference of 60.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($40,483 compared to $32,500, a difference of 24.6%), wage/income gap (26.7% compared to 21.3%, a difference of 25.3%), and median earnings ($48,356 compared to $36,876, a difference of 31.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (11.8% compared to 25.2%, a difference of 114.0%), receiving food stamps (11.1% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 106.8%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (16.4% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 103.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (28.3% compared to 43.2%, a difference of 52.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.8% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 53.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.3% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 59.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 79.7%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.5% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 73.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.3% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 45.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 1.0%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.1% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 2.2%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.5% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 21.1%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.6% compared to 56.8%, a difference of 17.4%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.8% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 15.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.3% compared to 78.3%, a difference of 8.9%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.0% compared to 77.0%, a difference of 10.4%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 10.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.4% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 58.6%), single mother households (6.2% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 45.7%), and single father households (2.2% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 24.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.9% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 1.3%), average family size (3.18 compared to 3.32, a difference of 4.3%), and family households with children (27.7% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 5.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 63.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 32.9%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (53.8% compared to 55.9%, a difference of 3.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.0% compared to 89.7%, a difference of 0.30%), no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 0.42%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (53.8% compared to 55.9%, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.0% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 102.6%), doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 90.7%), and master's degree (16.5% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 78.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (95.6% compared to 96.0%, a difference of 0.37%), 2nd grade (97.9% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.51%), and 4th grade (97.5% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.51%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.5% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 68.2%), ambulatory disability (5.7% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 67.2%), and vision disability (2.1% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 57.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.9% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 5.5%), disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 8.0%), and cognitive disability (17.1% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 11.7%).