Immigrants from Fiji vs Lumbee Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 42,552,820 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Lumbee within Immigrant from Fiji communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.347. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Fiji within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.033% in Lumbee. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Fiji corresponds to an increase of 33.0 Lumbee.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($103,954 compared to $60,305, a difference of 72.4%), median household income ($93,933 compared to $54,644, a difference of 71.9%), and householder income under 25 years ($57,074 compared to $34,584, a difference of 65.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (22.4% compared to 21.3%, a difference of 5.1%), median female earnings ($41,656 compared to $32,500, a difference of 28.2%), and median earnings ($48,305 compared to $36,876, a difference of 31.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (10.9% compared to 25.2%, a difference of 130.8%), child poverty under the age of 5 (15.2% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 119.8%), and single father poverty (13.2% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 115.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (5.6% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 48.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.2% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 62.2%), and single mother poverty (26.6% compared to 43.2%, a difference of 62.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.1% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 94.8%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.4% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 51.9%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.0% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 34.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 2.4%), female unemployment (5.8% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 3.2%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.1% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (65.0% compared to 56.8%, a difference of 14.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.3% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 13.4%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.6% compared to 70.6%, a difference of 11.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (83.6% compared to 78.3%, a difference of 6.7%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.5% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 7.9%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.4% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 7.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (29.2% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 65.2%), single mother households (6.7% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 36.7%), and married-couple households (48.2% compared to 39.6%, a difference of 21.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (2.7% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 2.2%), average family size (3.45 compared to 3.32, a difference of 4.0%), and family households (68.8% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 9.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 32.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (26.1% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 12.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (62.3% compared to 55.9%, a difference of 11.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.2% compared to 89.7%, a difference of 2.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (9.6% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 9.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (62.3% compared to 55.9%, a difference of 11.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.5% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 131.7%), professional degree (3.7% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 51.9%), and doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 43.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (91.0% compared to 91.7%, a difference of 0.79%), 11th grade (89.9% compared to 88.9%, a difference of 1.1%), and kindergarten (96.5% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in ambulatory disability (6.0% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 57.8%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.3% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 56.6%), and vision disability (2.2% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 56.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.8% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 6.7%), cognitive disability (17.4% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 10.2%), and disability age over 75 (50.6% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 11.2%).