Arapaho vs Lumbee Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 12,006,756 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Lumbee within Arapaho communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 1.000. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Arapaho within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.226% in Lumbee. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Arapaho corresponds to an increase of 226.4 Lumbee.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($59,383 compared to $40,550, a difference of 46.4%), householder income under 25 years ($44,003 compared to $34,584, a difference of 27.2%), and median household income ($67,965 compared to $54,644, a difference of 24.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($41,758 compared to $41,715, a difference of 0.10%), median earnings ($36,586 compared to $36,876, a difference of 0.79%), and median female earnings ($31,489 compared to $32,500, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (14.1% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 62.5%), child poverty among boys under 16 (20.2% compared to 31.9%, a difference of 58.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.6% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 55.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (21.9% compared to 25.2%, a difference of 14.7%), single father poverty (24.0% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 18.8%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (25.2% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 23.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (10.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 91.3%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (16.8% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 81.7%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (12.8% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 81.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 13.5%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (13.8% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 14.7%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (16.3% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 22.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.3% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 20.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.8% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 12.6%), and in labor force | age > 16 (62.1% compared to 56.8%, a difference of 9.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (78.1% compared to 77.0%, a difference of 1.4%), in labor force | age 45-54 (77.1% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 2.0%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (76.6% compared to 78.3%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.1% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 28.0%), divorced or separated (14.8% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 16.6%), and average family size (3.64 compared to 3.32, a difference of 9.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (40.5% compared to 39.8%, a difference of 1.8%), births to unmarried women (47.1% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 2.3%), and family households with children (25.6% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 40.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (26.4% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 14.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (60.2% compared to 55.9%, a difference of 7.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.7% compared to 89.7%, a difference of 3.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 6.5%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (60.2% compared to 55.9%, a difference of 7.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 39.1%), professional degree (2.9% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 16.8%), and college, under 1 year (60.3% compared to 54.2%, a difference of 11.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.090%), 4th grade (98.1% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.10%), and 3rd grade (98.4% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.11%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in ambulatory disability (7.1% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 34.3%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.7% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 31.9%), and vision disability (2.6% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 29.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (4.1% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 1.0%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.1% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 4.6%), and disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 6.0%).