Slavic vs Lumbee Community Comparison

COMPARE

Slavic
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Lumbee
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Slavs

Lumbee

Good
Poor
7,593
SOCIAL INDEX
73.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
111th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,002
SOCIAL INDEX
17.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
276th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Lumbee Integration in Slavic Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 69,824,802 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Lumbee within Slavic communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.234. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Slavs within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.012% in Lumbee. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Slavs corresponds to an increase of 12.3 Lumbee.
Slavic Integration in Lumbee Communities

Slavic vs Lumbee Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Slavic and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($96,377 compared to $60,305, a difference of 59.8%), median household income ($86,398 compared to $54,644, a difference of 58.1%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($102,629 compared to $65,113, a difference of 57.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($39,613 compared to $32,500, a difference of 21.9%), wage/income gap (27.4% compared to 21.3%, a difference of 28.7%), and median earnings ($47,470 compared to $36,876, a difference of 28.7%).
Slavic vs Lumbee Income
Income MetricSlavicLumbee
Per Capita Income
Excellent
$45,049
Tragic
$29,845
Median Family Income
Good
$105,144
Tragic
$68,679
Median Household Income
Good
$86,398
Tragic
$54,644
Median Earnings
Excellent
$47,470
Tragic
$36,876
Median Male Earnings
Excellent
$56,390
Tragic
$41,715
Median Female Earnings
Average
$39,613
Tragic
$32,500
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$50,563
Tragic
$34,584
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Good
$96,377
Tragic
$60,305
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Good
$102,629
Tragic
$65,113
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Good
$61,709
Tragic
$40,550
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.4%
Exceptional
21.3%

Slavic vs Lumbee Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Slavic and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.6% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 115.8%), family poverty (8.1% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 109.9%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (15.7% compared to 31.9%, a difference of 103.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (29.6% compared to 43.2%, a difference of 46.3%), single female poverty (21.1% compared to 33.0%, a difference of 56.2%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.7% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 57.8%).
Slavic vs Lumbee Poverty
Poverty MetricSlavicLumbee
Poverty
Exceptional
11.5%
Tragic
21.9%
Families
Exceptional
8.1%
Tragic
17.0%
Males
Exceptional
10.5%
Tragic
20.2%
Females
Exceptional
12.5%
Tragic
23.5%
Females 18 to 24 years
Excellent
19.7%
Tragic
31.1%
Females 25 to 34 years
Good
13.2%
Tragic
26.3%
Children Under 5 years
Good
17.0%
Tragic
33.3%
Children Under 16 years
Excellent
15.4%
Tragic
31.0%
Boys Under 16 years
Excellent
15.7%
Tragic
31.9%
Girls Under 16 years
Excellent
15.7%
Tragic
30.7%
Single Males
Tragic
13.3%
Tragic
25.2%
Single Females
Average
21.1%
Tragic
33.0%
Single Fathers
Tragic
17.4%
Tragic
28.5%
Single Mothers
Fair
29.6%
Tragic
43.2%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
8.3%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.8%
Tragic
18.1%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.2%
Tragic
19.7%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
10.6%
Tragic
22.9%

Slavic vs Lumbee Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Slavic and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 78.2%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.5% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 71.6%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 46.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 3.0%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.7% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 6.4%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 7.1%).
Slavic vs Lumbee Unemployment
Unemployment MetricSlavicLumbee
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
6.4%
Males
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
6.9%
Females
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
5.9%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.2%
Tragic
13.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.7%
Tragic
19.1%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
10.0%
Tragic
12.0%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Good
6.5%
Tragic
11.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Fair
5.5%
Tragic
7.1%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Good
4.6%
Tragic
5.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
4.6%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Excellent
4.7%
Fair
4.9%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Exceptional
4.8%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
4.6%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.2%
Tragic
13.5%
Women w/ Children < 6
Fair
7.7%
Tragic
13.8%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.7%
Tragic
9.3%
Women w/ Children < 18
Excellent
5.2%
Tragic
7.1%

Slavic vs Lumbee Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Slavic and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.4% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 30.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.9% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 17.3%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.6% compared to 56.8%, a difference of 13.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.1% compared to 78.3%, a difference of 8.6%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.9% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 9.7%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 77.0%, a difference of 10.0%).
Slavic vs Lumbee Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricSlavicLumbee
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
64.6%
Tragic
56.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Average
79.6%
Tragic
70.6%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
40.4%
Tragic
31.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
76.9%
Tragic
65.5%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.1%
Tragic
78.3%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.0%
Tragic
77.3%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
84.7%
Tragic
77.0%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Good
82.9%
Tragic
75.6%

Slavic vs Lumbee Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Slavic and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.9% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 55.1%), births to unmarried women (31.6% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 52.5%), and single father households (2.2% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 23.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.0% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 1.5%), family households with children (26.8% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 1.9%), and divorced or separated (12.2% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 4.0%).
Slavic vs Lumbee Family Structure
Family Structure MetricSlavicLumbee
Family Households
Poor
64.0%
Tragic
63.1%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.8%
Tragic
26.3%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
47.8%
Tragic
39.6%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.13
Exceptional
3.32
Single Father Households
Excellent
2.2%
Tragic
2.8%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.9%
Tragic
9.1%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.4%
Tragic
39.8%
Divorced or Separated
Poor
12.2%
Tragic
12.7%
Births to Unmarried Women
Average
31.6%
Tragic
48.2%

Slavic vs Lumbee Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Slavic and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 33.8%), no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 15.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.4% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 13.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.2% compared to 89.7%, a difference of 1.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.8% compared to 55.9%, a difference of 3.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.4% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 13.4%).
Slavic vs Lumbee Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricSlavicLumbee
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
9.0%
Average
10.3%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
91.2%
Average
89.7%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
57.8%
Good
55.9%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
20.4%
Exceptional
23.1%
4+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
6.6%
Exceptional
8.8%

Slavic vs Lumbee Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Slavic and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 84.7%), doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 74.8%), and master's degree (15.5% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 67.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3rd grade (98.3% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.040%), 2nd grade (98.3% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.060%), and 4th grade (98.1% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.070%).
Slavic vs Lumbee Education Level
Education Level MetricSlavicLumbee
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.7%
Exceptional
1.5%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.5%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.5%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.5%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.4%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.3%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
98.0%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Exceptional
97.8%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Exceptional
97.6%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.1%
Exceptional
96.6%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.8%
Excellent
96.0%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.1%
Tragic
94.4%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.2%
Tragic
91.7%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.1%
Tragic
88.9%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.8%
Tragic
85.7%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.0%
Tragic
83.6%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
87.7%
Tragic
80.0%
College, Under 1 year
Excellent
66.7%
Tragic
54.2%
College, 1 year or more
Excellent
60.6%
Tragic
48.9%
Associate's Degree
Excellent
47.6%
Tragic
34.1%
Bachelor's Degree
Good
38.9%
Tragic
24.8%
Master's Degree
Good
15.5%
Tragic
9.3%
Professional Degree
Good
4.5%
Tragic
2.5%
Doctorate Degree
Good
1.9%
Tragic
1.1%

Slavic vs Lumbee Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Slavic and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.2% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 55.9%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.7% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 51.4%), and ambulatory disability (6.4% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 50.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (7.4% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 0.59%), disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 4.4%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.9% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 5.4%).
Slavic vs Lumbee Disability
Disability MetricSlavicLumbee
Disability
Tragic
12.4%
Tragic
15.5%
Males
Tragic
12.2%
Tragic
15.2%
Females
Tragic
12.6%
Tragic
15.8%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.4%
Tragic
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
5.9%
Tragic
6.2%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.4%
Tragic
7.4%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Poor
11.7%
Tragic
17.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Good
23.0%
Tragic
32.7%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.1%
Tragic
56.2%
Vision
Average
2.2%
Tragic
3.4%
Hearing
Tragic
3.4%
Tragic
4.1%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.7%
Tragic
19.1%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.4%
Tragic
9.5%
Self-Care
Fair
2.5%
Tragic
3.0%