Latvian vs Lumbee Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,343,325 people shows a near-perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Lumbee within Latvian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.935. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Latvians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.781% in Lumbee. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Latvians corresponds to an increase of 780.5 Lumbee.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Latvian and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($108,926 compared to $60,305, a difference of 80.6%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($115,957 compared to $65,113, a difference of 78.1%), and median household income ($97,311 compared to $54,644, a difference of 78.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.9% compared to 21.3%, a difference of 30.7%), median female earnings ($43,941 compared to $32,500, a difference of 35.2%), and median earnings ($53,001 compared to $36,876, a difference of 43.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Latvian and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.1% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 151.3%), family poverty (7.1% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 140.1%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (13.4% compared to 31.9%, a difference of 138.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.5% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 59.5%), single mother poverty (26.9% compared to 43.2%, a difference of 60.9%), and single father poverty (16.5% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 73.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Latvian and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 103.8%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 82.0%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.6% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 56.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.6% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 5.3%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 6.1%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 7.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Latvian and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.9% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 25.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 16.1%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 56.8%, a difference of 15.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (86.1% compared to 78.3%, a difference of 9.9%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.8% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 10.8%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.4% compared to 77.0%, a difference of 10.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Latvian and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (27.7% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 73.8%), single mother households (5.3% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 72.2%), and single father households (2.0% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 38.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.8% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 0.47%), family households with children (26.4% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 0.59%), and average family size (3.11 compared to 3.32, a difference of 6.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 43.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 20.1%), and no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 5.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.3% compared to 89.7%, a difference of 0.67%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.2% compared to 55.9%, a difference of 0.68%), and no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 5.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Latvian and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.2% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 153.6%), doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 136.5%), and master's degree (19.8% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 113.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.010%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.020%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.020%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.2% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 73.5%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 70.7%), and ambulatory disability (5.7% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 66.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 2.8%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.8% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 8.8%), and cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 14.9%).