British vs Lumbee Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 90,974,961 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Lumbee within British communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.752. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in British within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.747% in Lumbee. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 British corresponds to an increase of 747.3 Lumbee.

When considering income, the most significant differences between British and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($106,264 compared to $65,113, a difference of 63.2%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($98,359 compared to $60,305, a difference of 63.1%), and median household income ($88,914 compared to $54,644, a difference of 62.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($39,772 compared to $32,500, a difference of 22.4%), median earnings ($48,189 compared to $36,876, a difference of 30.7%), and wage/income gap (28.9% compared to 21.3%, a difference of 35.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between British and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.7% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 135.4%), family poverty (7.9% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 114.6%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (15.0% compared to 31.9%, a difference of 113.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (29.2% compared to 43.2%, a difference of 48.3%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.7% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 50.3%), and single female poverty (21.1% compared to 33.0%, a difference of 56.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between British and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.6% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 82.4%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.4% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 75.1%), and male unemployment (4.8% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 43.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.9% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 3.7%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 6.9%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.5% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 8.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between British and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.5% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 30.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.7% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 17.1%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 56.8%, a difference of 13.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 78.3%, a difference of 8.2%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.6% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 9.2%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 77.0%, a difference of 9.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between British and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.8% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 57.4%), births to unmarried women (30.8% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 56.5%), and single father households (2.2% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 24.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.4% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 2.1%), divorced or separated (12.3% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 3.6%), and family households with children (27.4% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between British and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 36.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.2% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 22.0%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (60.0% compared to 55.9%, a difference of 7.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.5% compared to 89.7%, a difference of 3.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 5.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (60.0% compared to 55.9%, a difference of 7.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between British and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.0% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 104.4%), doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 99.0%), and master's degree (16.4% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 76.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.020%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.050%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.050%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between British and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in ambulatory disability (6.2% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 54.6%), vision disability (2.2% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 53.6%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.6% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 51.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (7.3% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 1.5%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.9% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 6.2%), and disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 10.3%).