Laotian vs Lumbee Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 62,742,491 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Lumbee within Laotian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.427. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Laotians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.084% in Lumbee. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Laotians corresponds to an increase of 84.4 Lumbee.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Laotian and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($104,993 compared to $60,305, a difference of 74.1%), median household income ($94,990 compared to $54,644, a difference of 73.8%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($111,051 compared to $65,113, a difference of 70.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.4% compared to 21.3%, a difference of 23.7%), median female earnings ($42,133 compared to $32,500, a difference of 29.6%), and median earnings ($50,343 compared to $36,876, a difference of 36.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Laotian and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.0% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 129.9%), child poverty under the age of 5 (14.7% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 126.2%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (14.3% compared to 31.9%, a difference of 122.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.3% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 60.4%), single mother poverty (27.0% compared to 43.2%, a difference of 60.4%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.2% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 61.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Laotian and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.5% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 111.2%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.5% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 73.4%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.2% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 63.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 2.1%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 4.9%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.2% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 10.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Laotian and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (65.8% compared to 56.8%, a difference of 15.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.1% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 13.2%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.6% compared to 70.6%, a difference of 12.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 78.3%, a difference of 7.8%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 77.0%, a difference of 9.3%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 9.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Laotian and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (28.5% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 69.3%), single mother households (5.8% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 56.2%), and single father households (2.2% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 24.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.26 compared to 3.32, a difference of 1.9%), family households (65.8% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 4.3%), and family households with children (28.5% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 8.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Laotian and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 19.0%), no vehicles in household (9.1% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 14.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 7.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 89.7%, a difference of 1.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.6% compared to 55.9%, a difference of 4.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 7.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Laotian and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.2% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 113.0%), doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 111.8%), and master's degree (17.0% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 83.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (94.6% compared to 94.4%, a difference of 0.31%), 8th grade (95.4% compared to 96.0%, a difference of 0.65%), and kindergarten (97.8% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.70%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Laotian and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.1% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 74.5%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 69.5%), and ambulatory disability (5.7% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 68.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 10.0%), cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 10.7%), and disability age over 75 (47.9% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 17.5%).