Crow vs Lumbee Community Comparison
COMPARE
Crow
Lumbee
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Crow
Lumbee
2,555
SOCIAL INDEX
23.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
251st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,002
SOCIAL INDEX
17.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
276th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Lumbee Integration in Crow Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 31,085,447 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Lumbee within Crow communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.107. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Crow within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.003% in Lumbee. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Crow corresponds to a decrease of 3.2 Lumbee.
Crow vs Lumbee Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Crow and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($47,012 compared to $34,584, a difference of 35.9%), householder income over 65 years ($49,234 compared to $40,550, a difference of 21.4%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($71,337 compared to $60,305, a difference of 18.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($42,434 compared to $41,715, a difference of 1.7%), median earnings ($38,707 compared to $36,876, a difference of 5.0%), and per capita income ($31,729 compared to $29,845, a difference of 6.3%).
Income Metric | Crow | Lumbee |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $31,729 | Tragic $29,845 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $76,605 | Tragic $68,679 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $63,681 | Tragic $54,644 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $38,707 | Tragic $36,876 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $42,434 | Tragic $41,715 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $35,266 | Tragic $32,500 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $47,012 | Tragic $34,584 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $71,337 | Tragic $60,305 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $74,257 | Tragic $65,113 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $49,234 | Tragic $40,550 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 19.1% | Exceptional 21.3% |
Crow vs Lumbee Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Crow and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (13.4% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 70.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.9% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 23.9%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (26.3% compared to 31.9%, a difference of 21.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (32.4% compared to 33.0%, a difference of 1.8%), family poverty (16.1% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 5.5%), and male poverty (19.1% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 5.6%).
Poverty Metric | Crow | Lumbee |
Poverty | Tragic 20.7% | Tragic 21.9% |
Families | Tragic 16.1% | Tragic 17.0% |
Males | Tragic 19.1% | Tragic 20.2% |
Females | Tragic 22.1% | Tragic 23.5% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 33.2% | Tragic 31.1% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 22.7% | Tragic 26.3% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 31.0% | Tragic 33.3% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 26.0% | Tragic 31.0% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 26.3% | Tragic 31.9% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 26.4% | Tragic 30.7% |
Single Males | Tragic 23.3% | Tragic 25.2% |
Single Females | Tragic 32.4% | Tragic 33.0% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 30.3% | Tragic 28.5% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 38.6% | Tragic 43.2% |
Married Couples | Tragic 9.6% | Tragic 8.3% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 15.2% | Tragic 18.1% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 15.9% | Tragic 19.7% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.4% | Tragic 22.9% |
Crow vs Lumbee Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Crow and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (17.4% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 266.1%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (16.9% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 263.8%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (13.7% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 196.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 0.35%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (14.6% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 6.1%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (8.2% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 16.4%).
Unemployment Metric | Crow | Lumbee |
Unemployment | Tragic 11.1% | Tragic 6.4% |
Males | Tragic 10.6% | Tragic 6.9% |
Females | Tragic 12.1% | Tragic 5.9% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 20.1% | Tragic 13.3% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 26.2% | Tragic 19.1% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 18.7% | Tragic 12.0% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 15.4% | Tragic 11.2% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 10.3% | Tragic 7.1% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 15.7% | Tragic 5.4% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 13.7% | Tragic 4.6% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.9% | Fair 4.9% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.0% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 17.4% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 16.9% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 5.9% | Tragic 13.5% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 14.6% | Tragic 13.8% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.2% | Tragic 9.3% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 8.2% | Tragic 7.1% |
Crow vs Lumbee Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Crow and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.5% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 24.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.9% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 17.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (60.8% compared to 56.8%, a difference of 7.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (78.6% compared to 78.3%, a difference of 0.37%), in labor force | age 35-44 (76.5% compared to 77.0%, a difference of 0.69%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (75.9% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 1.8%).
Labor Participation Metric | Crow | Lumbee |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 60.8% | Tragic 56.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 73.3% | Tragic 70.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.5% | Tragic 31.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 76.9% | Tragic 65.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 78.6% | Tragic 78.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 75.9% | Tragic 77.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 76.5% | Tragic 77.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 78.3% | Tragic 75.6% |
Crow vs Lumbee Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Crow and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.5% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 26.5%), single mother households (7.4% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 22.2%), and births to unmarried women (40.4% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 19.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (40.4% compared to 39.8%, a difference of 1.3%), family households (65.3% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 3.5%), and family households with children (27.4% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 4.1%).
Family Structure Metric | Crow | Lumbee |
Family Households | Exceptional 65.3% | Tragic 63.1% |
Family Households with Children | Fair 27.4% | Tragic 26.3% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 41.4% | Tragic 39.6% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.82 | Exceptional 3.32 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 3.5% | Tragic 2.8% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.4% | Tragic 9.1% |
Currently Married | Tragic 40.4% | Tragic 39.8% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 14.1% | Tragic 12.7% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 40.4% | Tragic 48.2% |
Crow vs Lumbee Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Crow and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 12.9%), no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 6.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.5% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (55.7% compared to 55.9%, a difference of 0.23%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.3% compared to 89.7%, a difference of 0.49%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.5% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 3.0%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Crow | Lumbee |
No Vehicles Available | Poor 11.0% | Average 10.3% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Fair 89.3% | Average 89.7% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Good 55.7% | Good 55.9% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.5% | Exceptional 23.1% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.8% | Exceptional 8.8% |
Crow vs Lumbee Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Crow and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 35.6%), professional degree (3.2% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 28.3%), and master's degree (10.6% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 14.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (99.7% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.1%), kindergarten (99.7% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.2%), and 1st grade (99.6% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.2%).
Education Level Metric | Crow | Lumbee |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.6% | Exceptional 1.5% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 99.7% | Exceptional 98.5% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 99.7% | Exceptional 98.5% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 99.6% | Exceptional 98.5% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 99.6% | Exceptional 98.4% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 99.6% | Exceptional 98.3% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 99.6% | Exceptional 98.0% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 99.5% | Exceptional 97.8% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 99.4% | Exceptional 97.6% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 99.1% | Exceptional 96.6% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 99.0% | Excellent 96.0% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 96.1% | Tragic 94.4% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 94.7% | Tragic 91.7% |
11th Grade | Excellent 92.9% | Tragic 88.9% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 90.0% | Tragic 85.7% |
High School Diploma | Poor 88.4% | Tragic 83.6% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 83.8% | Tragic 80.0% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 60.2% | Tragic 54.2% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 54.5% | Tragic 48.9% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 37.6% | Tragic 34.1% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 27.7% | Tragic 24.8% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 10.6% | Tragic 9.3% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.2% | Tragic 2.5% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Tragic 1.1% |
Crow vs Lumbee Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Crow and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in ambulatory disability (6.9% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 38.1%), vision disability (2.5% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 35.7%), and female disability (12.7% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 24.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (4.2% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 1.4%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 8.8%), and cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 10.3%).
Disability Metric | Crow | Lumbee |
Disability | Tragic 12.9% | Tragic 15.5% |
Males | Tragic 13.1% | Tragic 15.2% |
Females | Tragic 12.7% | Tragic 15.8% |
Age | Under 5 years | Average 1.2% | Tragic 1.3% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.4% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 8.3% | Tragic 7.4% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 14.6% | Tragic 17.6% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 27.9% | Tragic 32.7% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 49.6% | Tragic 56.2% |
Vision | Tragic 2.5% | Tragic 3.4% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.2% | Tragic 4.1% |
Cognitive | Fair 17.3% | Tragic 19.1% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 6.9% | Tragic 9.5% |
Self-Care | Poor 2.5% | Tragic 3.0% |