Jordanian vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 163,901,849 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South Central Asia within Jordanian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.218. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Jordanians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.199% in Immigrants from South Central Asia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Jordanians corresponds to a decrease of 199.2 Immigrants from South Central Asia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Jordanian and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($58,500 compared to $68,960, a difference of 17.9%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($99,186 compared to $116,626, a difference of 17.6%), and median household income ($91,794 compared to $106,057, a difference of 15.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($64,313 compared to $70,103, a difference of 9.0%), wage/income gap (26.8% compared to 29.3%, a difference of 9.4%), and householder income under 25 years ($51,796 compared to $57,818, a difference of 11.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Jordanian and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among boys under 16 (15.1% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 19.1%), child poverty under the age of 16 (14.8% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 18.5%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (15.6% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 17.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 2.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.1% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 4.4%), and single mother poverty (26.4% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Jordanian and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.0% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 12.7%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.3% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 11.2%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.1% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 11.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.1% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 0.11%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.1% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.74%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 0.88%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Jordanian and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.4% compared to 34.6%, a difference of 5.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.5% compared to 74.0%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.3% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 1.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.14%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.4% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.68%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 0.75%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Jordanian and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (28.5% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 15.6%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 11.4%), and single mother households (6.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 10.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.24 compared to 3.23, a difference of 0.46%), family households (65.5% compared to 66.4%, a difference of 1.3%), and family households with children (29.0% compared to 30.0%, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Jordanian and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 7.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 4.1%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.6% compared to 56.6%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 91.5%, a difference of 0.060%), no vehicles in household (8.5% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 0.45%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.6% compared to 56.6%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Jordanian and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 31.1%), master's degree (16.5% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 25.5%), and professional degree (4.7% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 24.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.1% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.020%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.020%), and 1st grade (98.0% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.020%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Jordanian and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.1% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 14.4%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 12.0%), and male disability (10.5% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 10.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.1% compared to 46.0%, a difference of 0.16%), cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 2.6%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 4.5%).