Chickasaw vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Community Comparison
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Immigrants from South Central Asia
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Chickasaw
Immigrants from South Central Asia
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,859
SOCIAL INDEX
96.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
6th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Immigrants from South Central Asia Integration in Chickasaw Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 139,636,754 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South Central Asia within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.412. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.048% in Immigrants from South Central Asia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to a decrease of 48.5 Immigrants from South Central Asia.
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($70,005 compared to $106,057, a difference of 51.5%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,193 compared to $124,188, a difference of 51.1%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($77,929 compared to $116,626, a difference of 49.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 29.3%, a difference of 8.0%), householder income under 25 years ($44,763 compared to $57,818, a difference of 29.2%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,732 compared to $70,103, a difference of 30.5%).
Income Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from South Central Asia |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $36,475 | Exceptional $52,660 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $85,356 | Exceptional $125,956 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $70,005 | Exceptional $106,057 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $40,672 | Exceptional $57,114 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $47,832 | Exceptional $68,960 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $34,414 | Exceptional $46,324 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $44,763 | Exceptional $57,818 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $77,929 | Exceptional $116,626 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $82,193 | Exceptional $124,188 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $53,732 | Exceptional $70,103 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.2% | Tragic 29.3% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (21.8% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 64.6%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.0% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 58.2%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (19.8% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 56.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 2.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 10.6%), and single father poverty (19.0% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 30.7%).
Poverty Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from South Central Asia |
Poverty | Tragic 14.7% | Exceptional 10.2% |
Families | Tragic 10.8% | Exceptional 7.2% |
Males | Tragic 13.5% | Exceptional 9.3% |
Females | Tragic 15.9% | Exceptional 11.1% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 24.5% | Exceptional 17.6% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 17.0% | Exceptional 10.8% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 21.8% | Exceptional 13.3% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.5% | Exceptional 12.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 19.8% | Exceptional 12.7% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 19.6% | Exceptional 12.7% |
Single Males | Tragic 16.3% | Exceptional 10.9% |
Single Females | Tragic 26.3% | Exceptional 17.8% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 19.0% | Exceptional 14.5% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 34.4% | Exceptional 25.3% |
Married Couples | Tragic 5.8% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Good 10.7% | Exceptional 9.7% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.6% | Exceptional 11.4% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.1% | Exceptional 8.8% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.0% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 35.6%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.2% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 27.3%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.9% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 20.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.63%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 2.1%), and female unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 2.3%).
Unemployment Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from South Central Asia |
Unemployment | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Males | Excellent 5.2% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Females | Excellent 5.1% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.2% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.7% | Exceptional 16.2% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.9% | Excellent 10.1% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Fair 6.7% | Exceptional 6.1% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.2% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 4.9% | Exceptional 4.1% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Good 4.8% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 5.3% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.4% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.3% | Exceptional 8.2% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 9.0% | Exceptional 6.6% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.6% | Exceptional 7.9% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Good 5.4% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 34.6%, a difference of 10.9%), in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 7.6%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 6.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 74.0%, a difference of 0.66%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 3.9%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 4.1%).
Labor Participation Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from South Central Asia |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 62.3% | Exceptional 67.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 76.2% | Exceptional 80.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.3% | Tragic 34.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Poor 74.5% | Tragic 74.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 81.9% | Exceptional 85.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 81.9% | Exceptional 85.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 80.9% | Exceptional 85.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 79.0% | Exceptional 84.0% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 47.0%), single father households (2.8% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 40.0%), and divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 36.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.19 compared to 3.23, a difference of 1.3%), family households (64.4% compared to 66.4%, a difference of 3.1%), and family households with children (28.2% compared to 30.0%, a difference of 6.5%).
Family Structure Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from South Central Asia |
Family Households | Good 64.4% | Exceptional 66.4% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.2% | Exceptional 30.0% |
Married-couple Households | Fair 45.9% | Exceptional 50.6% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.19 | Average 3.23 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.8% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.0% | Exceptional 5.4% |
Currently Married | Average 46.6% | Exceptional 50.0% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 14.2% | Exceptional 10.4% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 36.3% | Exceptional 24.7% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 21.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 14.8%), and no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 9.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 91.5%, a difference of 0.86%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 56.6%, a difference of 4.3%), and no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 9.0%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from South Central Asia |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.9% | Exceptional 8.6% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.3% | Exceptional 91.5% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 59.0% | Exceptional 56.6% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.2% | Fair 19.3% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.4% | Fair 6.1% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (11.4% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 81.4%), professional degree (3.4% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 75.5%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 74.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (95.5% compared to 95.4%, a difference of 0.080%), nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.36%), and kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.37%).
Education Level Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from South Central Asia |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.7% | Good 2.0% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.4% | Good 98.0% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.4% | Good 98.0% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Good 98.0% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Good 97.9% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Good 97.8% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Good 97.6% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Good 97.5% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Good 97.2% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.7% | Excellent 96.3% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.4% | Excellent 96.1% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.5% | Exceptional 95.4% |
10th Grade | Excellent 94.1% | Exceptional 94.5% |
11th Grade | Fair 92.3% | Exceptional 93.6% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 90.3% | Exceptional 92.6% |
High School Diploma | Poor 88.4% | Exceptional 90.9% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 83.8% | Exceptional 88.4% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 60.4% | Exceptional 72.1% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 53.3% | Exceptional 67.1% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 38.6% | Exceptional 55.7% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 30.4% | Exceptional 48.3% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.4% | Exceptional 20.7% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.4% | Exceptional 5.9% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Exceptional 2.6% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 81.8%), vision disability (3.2% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 78.0%), and hearing disability (4.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 73.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 46.0%, a difference of 11.3%), cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 13.1%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 30.4%).
Disability Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from South Central Asia |
Disability | Tragic 15.2% | Exceptional 9.9% |
Males | Tragic 15.1% | Exceptional 9.4% |
Females | Tragic 15.2% | Exceptional 10.5% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.7% | Exceptional 1.0% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.8% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 9.0% | Exceptional 5.7% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 16.1% | Exceptional 8.9% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 30.2% | Exceptional 20.6% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 51.2% | Exceptional 46.0% |
Vision | Tragic 3.2% | Exceptional 1.8% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.5% | Exceptional 2.6% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.5% | Exceptional 16.4% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.0% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.9% | Exceptional 2.2% |