Maltese vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 123,328,571 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South Central Asia within Maltese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.432. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Maltese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.534% in Immigrants from South Central Asia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Maltese corresponds to an increase of 534.1 Immigrants from South Central Asia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Maltese and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($62,953 compared to $68,960, a difference of 9.5%), median household income ($97,015 compared to $106,057, a difference of 9.3%), and median earnings ($52,526 compared to $57,114, a difference of 8.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.7% compared to 29.3%, a difference of 2.0%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($110,064 compared to $116,626, a difference of 6.0%), and per capita income ($49,640 compared to $52,660, a difference of 6.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Maltese and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.3% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 10.5%), child poverty under the age of 5 (14.5% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 9.5%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (13.7% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 7.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (17.6% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 0.18%), poverty (10.2% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 0.45%), and receiving food stamps (8.9% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 0.77%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Maltese and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.1% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 14.9%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.5% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 10.2%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (11.2% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 10.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.68%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.4% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 0.82%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.5% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 0.99%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Maltese and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.5% compared to 34.6%, a difference of 11.5%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 3.5%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (76.3% compared to 74.0%, a difference of 3.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.31%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.33%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (86.0% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.87%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Maltese and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (27.8% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 12.8%), family households with children (26.7% compared to 30.0%, a difference of 12.3%), and divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 11.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (49.0% compared to 50.0%, a difference of 2.1%), average family size (3.16 compared to 3.23, a difference of 2.3%), and family households (64.7% compared to 66.4%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Maltese and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.7% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 8.7%), no vehicles in household (9.1% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 6.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.5% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 6.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 91.5%, a difference of 0.53%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.0% compared to 56.6%, a difference of 2.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.5% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 6.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Maltese and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 27.8%), no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 22.9%), and master's degree (17.3% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 20.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (88.6% compared to 88.4%, a difference of 0.28%), nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.39%), and kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.39%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Maltese and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.0%, a difference of 31.0%), hearing disability (3.2% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 24.6%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.6% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 19.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (45.8% compared to 46.0%, a difference of 0.30%), cognitive disability (16.2% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 0.75%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.6% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 4.9%).