Czechoslovakian vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 336,726,787 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South Central Asia within Czechoslovakian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.371. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Czechoslovakians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.107% in Immigrants from South Central Asia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Czechoslovakians corresponds to a decrease of 107.4 Immigrants from South Central Asia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($84,965 compared to $106,057, a difference of 24.8%), median male earnings ($55,382 compared to $68,960, a difference of 24.5%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($95,070 compared to $116,626, a difference of 22.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.2% compared to 29.3%, a difference of 4.0%), householder income under 25 years ($51,224 compared to $57,818, a difference of 12.9%), and householder income over 65 years ($60,581 compared to $70,103, a difference of 15.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.7% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 27.3%), child poverty under the age of 5 (16.8% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 26.7%), and single male poverty (13.4% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 22.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (4.4% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 0.97%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.5% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 2.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.9% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 16.6%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.4% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 15.1%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.1% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 14.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.26%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.37%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 0.38%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.9% compared to 34.6%, a difference of 21.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.5% compared to 74.0%, a difference of 4.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.3% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.24%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.8% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.41%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.6% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.44%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (32.0% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 29.8%), single father households (2.3% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 18.2%), and divorced or separated (12.3% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 17.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (48.8% compared to 50.0%, a difference of 2.5%), family households (64.6% compared to 66.4%, a difference of 2.8%), and average family size (3.13 compared to 3.23, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.1% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 16.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.7% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 12.4%), and no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 9.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 91.5%, a difference of 0.92%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.8% compared to 56.6%, a difference of 5.7%), and no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 9.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 46.8%), master's degree (14.5% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 42.7%), and professional degree (4.2% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 40.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (92.6% compared to 92.6%, a difference of 0.020%), high school diploma (90.9% compared to 90.9%, a difference of 0.070%), and 11th grade (94.0% compared to 93.6%, a difference of 0.41%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.0%, a difference of 47.1%), hearing disability (3.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 37.6%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.8% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 33.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.6% compared to 46.0%, a difference of 1.3%), cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 1.4%), and disability age 65 to 74 (23.0% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 11.7%).