Ecuadorian vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 304,100,170 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South Central Asia within Ecuadorian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.098. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ecuadorians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.024% in Immigrants from South Central Asia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ecuadorians corresponds to a decrease of 24.4 Immigrants from South Central Asia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($51,596 compared to $68,960, a difference of 33.7%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($93,739 compared to $124,188, a difference of 32.5%), and median family income ($95,114 compared to $125,956, a difference of 32.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,911 compared to $57,818, a difference of 7.2%), median female earnings ($39,117 compared to $46,324, a difference of 18.4%), and per capita income ($41,958 compared to $52,660, a difference of 25.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (14.9% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 68.4%), child poverty among boys under 16 (19.3% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 52.7%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (19.0% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 51.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.1% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 8.7%), single father poverty (16.5% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 13.7%), and single male poverty (12.5% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 14.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.5% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 31.5%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.4% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 31.4%), and male unemployment (6.2% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 29.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.6% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 4.8%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 10.7%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.6% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 12.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.4% compared to 34.6%, a difference of 10.1%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (72.4% compared to 74.0%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.4% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.82%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.88%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (33.3% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 34.8%), single mother households (7.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 33.4%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 21.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.0% compared to 66.4%, a difference of 2.2%), average family size (3.32 compared to 3.23, a difference of 2.7%), and family households with children (27.8% compared to 30.0%, a difference of 8.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (22.8% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 165.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 37.6%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (4.5% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 37.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (77.9% compared to 91.5%, a difference of 17.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (42.0% compared to 56.6%, a difference of 34.8%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (4.5% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 37.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 80.2%), professional degree (3.9% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 50.5%), and no schooling completed (3.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 48.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.1% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.99%), kindergarten (97.0% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 1.0%), and 1st grade (97.0% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.3% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 27.1%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.7% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 20.6%), and ambulatory disability (6.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 19.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (5.8% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 2.4%), hearing disability (2.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 2.9%), and disability age over 75 (47.4% compared to 46.0%, a difference of 3.0%).