Sri Lankan vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 410,057,007 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South Central Asia within Sri Lankan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.232. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Sri Lankans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.035% in Immigrants from South Central Asia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Sri Lankans corresponds to a decrease of 34.6 Immigrants from South Central Asia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Sri Lankan and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($56,136 compared to $68,960, a difference of 22.8%), per capita income ($44,014 compared to $52,660, a difference of 19.6%), and median earnings ($48,040 compared to $57,114, a difference of 18.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($55,470 compared to $57,818, a difference of 4.2%), householder income over 65 years ($64,201 compared to $70,103, a difference of 9.2%), and wage/income gap (25.8% compared to 29.3%, a difference of 13.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Sri Lankan and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.6% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 20.3%), child poverty under the age of 16 (14.9% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 19.2%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (15.2% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 19.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (14.2% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 2.5%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.2% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 3.4%), and single male poverty (11.5% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 4.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Sri Lankan and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.5% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 10.5%), male unemployment (5.2% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 8.9%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.5% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 7.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.040%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.2% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 0.19%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.6% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 0.59%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Sri Lankan and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.5% compared to 34.6%, a difference of 2.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.9% compared to 74.0%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.3% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 1.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.15%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.56%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.4% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.71%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Sri Lankan and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 19.7%), births to unmarried women (28.9% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 17.2%), and single mother households (6.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 15.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (29.5% compared to 30.0%, a difference of 1.7%), family households (67.7% compared to 66.4%, a difference of 2.0%), and married-couple households (49.0% compared to 50.6%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Sri Lankan and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.4% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 37.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.6% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 21.8%), and no vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 12.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.5% compared to 91.5%, a difference of 1.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.0% compared to 56.6%, a difference of 7.8%), and no vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 12.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Sri Lankan and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 52.9%), doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 40.8%), and master's degree (14.7% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 40.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.0% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 1.1%), kindergarten (97.0% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 1.1%), and 1st grade (96.9% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Sri Lankan and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.1% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 15.8%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.2% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 14.9%), and male disability (10.6% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 12.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.1% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 4.6%), disability age over 75 (48.5% compared to 46.0%, a difference of 5.4%), and female disability (11.4% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 9.2%).