Israeli vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 205,460,102 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South Central Asia within Israeli communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.434. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Israelis within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.423% in Immigrants from South Central Asia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Israelis corresponds to a decrease of 422.6 Immigrants from South Central Asia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Israeli and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($52,335 compared to $57,818, a difference of 10.5%), median household income ($96,552 compared to $106,057, a difference of 9.8%), and median male earnings ($63,228 compared to $68,960, a difference of 9.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($52,596 compared to $52,660, a difference of 0.12%), householder income over 65 years ($66,636 compared to $70,103, a difference of 5.2%), and median female earnings ($43,852 compared to $46,324, a difference of 5.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Israeli and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among boys under 16 (15.9% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 25.5%), child poverty under the age of 5 (16.6% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 24.9%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (15.5% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 23.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (28.0% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 10.9%), single female poverty (19.9% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 11.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.2% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 15.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Israeli and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (19.0% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 17.3%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.6% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 15.8%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.7% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 15.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.6% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 4.6%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 5.2%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 5.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Israeli and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (32.4% compared to 34.6%, a difference of 6.6%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.2% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 2.8%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (72.6% compared to 74.0%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.49%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.1% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.99%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Israeli and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (28.6% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 15.8%), family households with children (27.5% compared to 30.0%, a difference of 9.3%), and divorced or separated (11.3% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.23 compared to 3.23, a difference of 0.020%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 0.32%), and family households (63.1% compared to 66.4%, a difference of 5.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Israeli and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (12.4% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 45.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.2% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 16.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.8% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 15.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.7% compared to 91.5%, a difference of 4.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.9% compared to 56.6%, a difference of 9.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.8% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 15.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Israeli and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.9% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 17.5%), bachelor's degree (46.1% compared to 48.3%, a difference of 4.8%), and associate's degree (53.4% compared to 55.7%, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 6th grade (97.2% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.040%), 5th grade (97.5% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.050%), and 7th grade (96.3% compared to 96.3%, a difference of 0.050%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Israeli and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.0% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 11.0%), ambulatory disability (5.7% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 10.8%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 10.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.4% compared to 46.0%, a difference of 0.94%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.2% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 2.7%), and cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 3.9%).