Brazilian vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 310,083,176 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South Central Asia within Brazilian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.181. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Brazilians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.049% in Immigrants from South Central Asia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Brazilians corresponds to a decrease of 49.5 Immigrants from South Central Asia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($56,837 compared to $68,960, a difference of 21.3%), median household income ($88,934 compared to $106,057, a difference of 19.3%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($104,408 compared to $124,188, a difference of 19.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,335 compared to $57,818, a difference of 6.4%), wage/income gap (26.7% compared to 29.3%, a difference of 9.7%), and per capita income ($46,700 compared to $52,660, a difference of 12.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (11.1% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 25.5%), child poverty among boys under 16 (15.8% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 24.5%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (16.4% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 23.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.6% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 5.9%), single father poverty (15.5% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 6.6%), and single male poverty (11.8% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 7.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.8% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 17.5%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 16.2%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.7% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 15.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.2% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 0.39%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.5% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 2.3%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.5% compared to 34.6%, a difference of 8.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.8% compared to 74.0%, a difference of 2.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.6% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 0.66%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.3% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.040%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.0% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.050%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.5% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 0.22%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.4% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 23.1%), single mother households (6.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 15.8%), and divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 15.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.18 compared to 3.23, a difference of 1.4%), family households (63.9% compared to 66.4%, a difference of 4.0%), and currently married (46.4% compared to 50.0%, a difference of 7.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 21.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 13.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 11.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.0% compared to 91.5%, a difference of 1.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.8% compared to 56.6%, a difference of 5.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 11.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 26.6%), master's degree (16.5% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 25.2%), and bachelor's degree (40.8% compared to 48.3%, a difference of 18.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.020%), 1st grade (97.9% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.030%), and 2nd grade (97.9% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.040%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.0%, a difference of 41.7%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.9% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 25.0%), and vision disability (2.1% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 20.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 46.0%, a difference of 1.0%), cognitive disability (17.1% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 4.6%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 5.8%).