Immigrants from Oceania vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Community Comparison
COMPARE
Immigrants from Oceania
Immigrants from South Central Asia
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Immigrants from Oceania
Immigrants from South Central Asia
6,183
SOCIAL INDEX
59.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
161st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,859
SOCIAL INDEX
96.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
6th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Immigrants from South Central Asia Integration in Immigrants from Oceania Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 290,105,243 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South Central Asia within Immigrant from Oceania communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.211. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Oceania within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.047% in Immigrants from South Central Asia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Oceania corresponds to a decrease of 47.0 Immigrants from South Central Asia.
Immigrants from Oceania vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($55,712 compared to $68,960, a difference of 23.8%), median earnings ($47,617 compared to $57,114, a difference of 19.9%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,705 compared to $124,188, a difference of 19.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,680 compared to $57,818, a difference of 7.7%), householder income over 65 years ($64,416 compared to $70,103, a difference of 8.8%), and wage/income gap (25.6% compared to 29.3%, a difference of 14.4%).
| Income Metric | Immigrants from Oceania | Immigrants from South Central Asia |
| Per Capita Income | Excellent $45,220 | Exceptional $52,660 |
| Median Family Income | Excellent $106,453 | Exceptional $125,956 |
| Median Household Income | Exceptional $89,100 | Exceptional $106,057 |
| Median Earnings | Excellent $47,617 | Exceptional $57,114 |
| Median Male Earnings | Good $55,712 | Exceptional $68,960 |
| Median Female Earnings | Good $40,297 | Exceptional $46,324 |
| Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $53,680 | Exceptional $57,818 |
| Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Excellent $97,623 | Exceptional $116,626 |
| Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Excellent $103,705 | Exceptional $124,188 |
| Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $64,416 | Exceptional $70,103 |
| Wage/Income Gap | Average 25.6% | Tragic 29.3% |
Immigrants from Oceania vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (11.4% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 28.9%), child poverty under the age of 5 (16.9% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 27.5%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (15.9% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 26.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 2.5%), single father poverty (15.4% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 6.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.4% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 8.1%).
| Poverty Metric | Immigrants from Oceania | Immigrants from South Central Asia |
| Poverty | Average 12.3% | Exceptional 10.2% |
| Families | Good 8.7% | Exceptional 7.2% |
| Males | Average 11.2% | Exceptional 9.3% |
| Females | Average 13.3% | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Females 18 to 24 years | Excellent 19.7% | Exceptional 17.6% |
| Females 25 to 34 years | Average 13.5% | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Children Under 5 years | Good 16.9% | Exceptional 13.3% |
| Children Under 16 years | Good 15.9% | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Boys Under 16 years | Good 16.0% | Exceptional 12.7% |
| Girls Under 16 years | Good 16.1% | Exceptional 12.7% |
| Single Males | Exceptional 12.4% | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Single Females | Good 20.7% | Exceptional 17.8% |
| Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.4% | Exceptional 14.5% |
| Single Mothers | Good 28.7% | Exceptional 25.3% |
| Married Couples | Good 5.0% | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Seniors Over 65 years | Excellent 10.4% | Exceptional 9.7% |
| Seniors Over 75 years | Excellent 11.7% | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Receiving Food Stamps | Good 11.4% | Exceptional 8.8% |
Immigrants from Oceania vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.8% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 16.7%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.5% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 13.2%), and male unemployment (5.3% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 11.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.25%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.1% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 1.7%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 1.8%).
| Unemployment Metric | Immigrants from Oceania | Immigrants from South Central Asia |
| Unemployment | Good 5.2% | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Males | Average 5.3% | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Females | Good 5.2% | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Youth < 25 | Excellent 11.4% | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Age | 16 to 19 years | Excellent 17.2% | Exceptional 16.2% |
| Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 10.0% | Excellent 10.1% |
| Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.4% | Exceptional 6.1% |
| Age | 30 to 34 years | Good 5.4% | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Age | 35 to 44 years | Fair 4.8% | Exceptional 4.1% |
| Age | 45 to 54 years | Excellent 4.4% | Exceptional 4.2% |
| Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 4.6% |
| Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 4.7% |
| Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.2% | Exceptional 5.3% |
| Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Seniors > 75 | Poor 9.0% | Exceptional 8.2% |
| Women w/ Children < 6 | Good 7.5% | Exceptional 6.6% |
| Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.1% | Exceptional 7.9% |
| Women w/ Children < 18 | Excellent 5.3% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Immigrants from Oceania vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.9% compared to 34.6%, a difference of 9.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 74.0%, a difference of 2.9%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.2% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 1.3%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.9% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.0% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 1.3%).
| Labor Participation Metric | Immigrants from Oceania | Immigrants from South Central Asia |
| In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Excellent 65.5% | Exceptional 67.1% |
| In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Poor 79.3% | Exceptional 80.7% |
| In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 37.9% | Tragic 34.6% |
| In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 76.1% | Tragic 74.0% |
| In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 84.2% | Exceptional 85.2% |
| In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 84.0% | Exceptional 85.1% |
| In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 83.9% | Exceptional 85.0% |
| In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 82.1% | Exceptional 84.0% |
Immigrants from Oceania vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.5% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 25.1%), births to unmarried women (30.6% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 23.9%), and single mother households (6.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 16.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.29 compared to 3.23, a difference of 2.0%), family households (64.9% compared to 66.4%, a difference of 2.3%), and family households with children (28.1% compared to 30.0%, a difference of 6.9%).
| Family Structure Metric | Immigrants from Oceania | Immigrants from South Central Asia |
| Family Households | Exceptional 64.9% | Exceptional 66.4% |
| Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.1% | Exceptional 30.0% |
| Married-couple Households | Good 46.9% | Exceptional 50.6% |
| Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.29 | Average 3.23 |
| Single Father Households | Tragic 2.5% | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Single Mother Households | Average 6.3% | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Currently Married | Average 46.5% | Exceptional 50.0% |
| Divorced or Separated | Good 11.9% | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Births to Unmarried Women | Excellent 30.6% | Exceptional 24.7% |
Immigrants from Oceania vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 24.7%), no vehicles in household (9.7% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 13.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 12.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.4% compared to 91.5%, a difference of 1.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.5% compared to 56.6%, a difference of 1.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 12.8%).
| Vehicle Availability Metric | Immigrants from Oceania | Immigrants from South Central Asia |
| No Vehicles Available | Excellent 9.7% | Exceptional 8.6% |
| 1+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 90.4% | Exceptional 91.5% |
| 2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 57.5% | Exceptional 56.6% |
| 3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 21.8% | Fair 19.3% |
| 4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.6% | Fair 6.1% |
Immigrants from Oceania vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (14.7% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 41.2%), doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 37.7%), and bachelor's degree (37.3% compared to 48.3%, a difference of 29.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (97.8% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.21%), nursery school (97.8% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.22%), and 1st grade (97.8% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.22%).
| Education Level Metric | Immigrants from Oceania | Immigrants from South Central Asia |
| No Schooling Completed | Poor 2.2% | Good 2.0% |
| Nursery School | Poor 97.8% | Good 98.0% |
| Kindergarten | Poor 97.8% | Good 98.0% |
| 1st Grade | Poor 97.8% | Good 98.0% |
| 2nd Grade | Poor 97.7% | Good 97.9% |
| 3rd Grade | Tragic 97.6% | Good 97.8% |
| 4th Grade | Tragic 97.3% | Good 97.6% |
| 5th Grade | Poor 97.1% | Good 97.5% |
| 6th Grade | Poor 96.8% | Good 97.2% |
| 7th Grade | Tragic 95.7% | Excellent 96.3% |
| 8th Grade | Tragic 95.3% | Excellent 96.1% |
| 9th Grade | Poor 94.5% | Exceptional 95.4% |
| 10th Grade | Poor 93.4% | Exceptional 94.5% |
| 11th Grade | Fair 92.2% | Exceptional 93.6% |
| 12th Grade, No Diploma | Fair 90.9% | Exceptional 92.6% |
| High School Diploma | Fair 88.8% | Exceptional 90.9% |
| GED/Equivalency | Fair 85.5% | Exceptional 88.4% |
| College, Under 1 year | Average 65.6% | Exceptional 72.1% |
| College, 1 year or more | Average 59.4% | Exceptional 67.1% |
| Associate's Degree | Fair 45.8% | Exceptional 55.7% |
| Bachelor's Degree | Fair 37.3% | Exceptional 48.3% |
| Master's Degree | Fair 14.7% | Exceptional 20.7% |
| Professional Degree | Good 4.6% | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Doctorate Degree | Good 1.9% | Exceptional 2.6% |
Immigrants from Oceania vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (11.4% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 28.3%), hearing disability (3.2% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 23.3%), and vision disability (2.2% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 21.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.0% compared to 46.0%, a difference of 4.4%), cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 7.5%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.0%, a difference of 13.0%).
| Disability Metric | Immigrants from Oceania | Immigrants from South Central Asia |
| Disability | Fair 11.8% | Exceptional 9.9% |
| Males | Fair 11.4% | Exceptional 9.4% |
| Females | Good 12.1% | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.2% | Exceptional 1.0% |
| Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.4% | Exceptional 4.7% |
| Age | 18 to 34 years | Fair 6.7% | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Age | 35 to 64 years | Fair 11.4% | Exceptional 8.9% |
| Age | 65 to 74 years | Poor 24.0% | Exceptional 20.6% |
| Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 48.0% | Exceptional 46.0% |
| Vision | Average 2.2% | Exceptional 1.8% |
| Hearing | Tragic 3.2% | Exceptional 2.6% |
| Cognitive | Tragic 17.6% | Exceptional 16.4% |
| Ambulatory | Good 6.1% | Exceptional 5.1% |
| Self-Care | Fair 2.5% | Exceptional 2.2% |