Immigrants from Lithuania vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Community Comparison
COMPARE
Immigrants from Lithuania
Immigrants from South Central Asia
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Immigrants from Lithuania
Immigrants from South Central Asia
9,656
SOCIAL INDEX
94.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
10th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,859
SOCIAL INDEX
96.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
6th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Immigrants from South Central Asia Integration in Immigrants from Lithuania Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 116,283,757 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South Central Asia within Immigrant from Lithuania communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.307. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Lithuania within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.608% in Immigrants from South Central Asia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Lithuania corresponds to a decrease of 608.2 Immigrants from South Central Asia.
Immigrants from Lithuania vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($96,836 compared to $106,057, a difference of 9.5%), median male earnings ($63,346 compared to $68,960, a difference of 8.9%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($114,336 compared to $124,188, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.6% compared to 29.3%, a difference of 2.5%), per capita income ($51,361 compared to $52,660, a difference of 2.5%), and householder income under 25 years ($55,028 compared to $57,818, a difference of 5.1%).
| Income Metric | Immigrants from Lithuania | Immigrants from South Central Asia |
| Per Capita Income | Exceptional $51,361 | Exceptional $52,660 |
| Median Family Income | Exceptional $118,053 | Exceptional $125,956 |
| Median Household Income | Exceptional $96,836 | Exceptional $106,057 |
| Median Earnings | Exceptional $52,769 | Exceptional $57,114 |
| Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $63,346 | Exceptional $68,960 |
| Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $43,317 | Exceptional $46,324 |
| Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $55,028 | Exceptional $57,818 |
| Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $108,149 | Exceptional $116,626 |
| Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $114,336 | Exceptional $124,188 |
| Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $66,087 | Exceptional $70,103 |
| Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 28.6% | Tragic 29.3% |
Immigrants from Lithuania vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among boys under 16 (13.5% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 6.5%), child poverty under the age of 5 (14.1% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 6.3%), and single male poverty (11.6% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 6.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (17.8% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 0.060%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.7% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 0.17%), and single mother poverty (25.2% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 0.19%).
| Poverty Metric | Immigrants from Lithuania | Immigrants from South Central Asia |
| Poverty | Exceptional 10.3% | Exceptional 10.2% |
| Families | Exceptional 7.2% | Exceptional 7.2% |
| Males | Exceptional 9.4% | Exceptional 9.3% |
| Females | Exceptional 11.3% | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 17.4% | Exceptional 17.6% |
| Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 11.1% | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 14.1% | Exceptional 13.3% |
| Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 12.9% | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.5% | Exceptional 12.7% |
| Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.1% | Exceptional 12.7% |
| Single Males | Exceptional 11.6% | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Single Females | Exceptional 17.8% | Exceptional 17.8% |
| Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.3% | Exceptional 14.5% |
| Single Mothers | Exceptional 25.2% | Exceptional 25.3% |
| Married Couples | Exceptional 4.3% | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 9.7% | Exceptional 9.7% |
| Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.0% | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 9.2% | Exceptional 8.8% |
Immigrants from Lithuania vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.5% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 14.2%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.6% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 9.7%), and male unemployment (5.1% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 7.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.1% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 0.030%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.57%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.3% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.61%).
| Unemployment Metric | Immigrants from Lithuania | Immigrants from South Central Asia |
| Unemployment | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Males | Excellent 5.1% | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Females | Exceptional 4.9% | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.3% | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 17.0% | Exceptional 16.2% |
| Age | 20 to 24 years | Excellent 10.1% | Excellent 10.1% |
| Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.2% | Exceptional 6.1% |
| Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.2% | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Exceptional 4.1% |
| Age | 45 to 54 years | Fair 4.6% | Exceptional 4.2% |
| Age | 55 to 59 years | Good 4.8% | Exceptional 4.6% |
| Age | 60 to 64 years | Excellent 4.8% | Exceptional 4.7% |
| Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.2% | Exceptional 5.3% |
| Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Seniors > 75 | Average 8.7% | Exceptional 8.2% |
| Women w/ Children < 6 | Good 7.5% | Exceptional 6.6% |
| Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.6% | Exceptional 7.9% |
| Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 5.2% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Immigrants from Lithuania vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.2% compared to 34.6%, a difference of 7.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 74.0%, a difference of 2.9%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (80.7% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 0.020%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.9% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 0.19%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.4% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.47%).
| Labor Participation Metric | Immigrants from Lithuania | Immigrants from South Central Asia |
| In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 65.6% | Exceptional 67.1% |
| In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.7% | Exceptional 80.7% |
| In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Excellent 37.2% | Tragic 34.6% |
| In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 76.1% | Tragic 74.0% |
| In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 86.1% | Exceptional 85.2% |
| In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.6% | Exceptional 85.1% |
| In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 85.4% | Exceptional 85.0% |
| In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.9% | Exceptional 84.0% |
Immigrants from Lithuania vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (27.7% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 12.4%), family households with children (26.8% compared to 30.0%, a difference of 12.1%), and divorced or separated (11.3% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 8.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.15 compared to 3.23, a difference of 2.4%), currently married (48.8% compared to 50.0%, a difference of 2.4%), and single mother households (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 2.8%).
| Family Structure Metric | Immigrants from Lithuania | Immigrants from South Central Asia |
| Family Households | Poor 63.9% | Exceptional 66.4% |
| Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.8% | Exceptional 30.0% |
| Married-couple Households | Exceptional 48.6% | Exceptional 50.6% |
| Average Family Size | Tragic 3.15 | Average 3.23 |
| Single Father Households | Exceptional 1.9% | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.3% | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Currently Married | Exceptional 48.8% | Exceptional 50.0% |
| Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.3% | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 27.7% | Exceptional 24.7% |
Immigrants from Lithuania vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 14.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.6% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 8.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.5% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 4.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 91.5%, a difference of 1.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.8% compared to 56.6%, a difference of 1.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.5% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 4.8%).
| Vehicle Availability Metric | Immigrants from Lithuania | Immigrants from South Central Asia |
| No Vehicles Available | Excellent 9.8% | Exceptional 8.6% |
| 1+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 90.2% | Exceptional 91.5% |
| 2+ Vehicles Available | Good 55.8% | Exceptional 56.6% |
| 3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 18.5% | Fair 19.3% |
| 4+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 5.6% | Fair 6.1% |
Immigrants from Lithuania vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 19.0%), no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 18.0%), and master's degree (18.5% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 12.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (88.6% compared to 88.4%, a difference of 0.21%), nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.32%), and kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.32%).
| Education Level Metric | Immigrants from Lithuania | Immigrants from South Central Asia |
| No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.7% | Good 2.0% |
| Nursery School | Exceptional 98.3% | Good 98.0% |
| Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.3% | Good 98.0% |
| 1st Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Good 98.0% |
| 2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Good 97.9% |
| 3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Good 97.8% |
| 4th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Good 97.6% |
| 5th Grade | Exceptional 97.8% | Good 97.5% |
| 6th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Good 97.2% |
| 7th Grade | Exceptional 96.8% | Excellent 96.3% |
| 8th Grade | Exceptional 96.6% | Excellent 96.1% |
| 9th Grade | Exceptional 95.8% | Exceptional 95.4% |
| 10th Grade | Exceptional 95.0% | Exceptional 94.5% |
| 11th Grade | Exceptional 94.1% | Exceptional 93.6% |
| 12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 93.1% | Exceptional 92.6% |
| High School Diploma | Exceptional 91.3% | Exceptional 90.9% |
| GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 88.6% | Exceptional 88.4% |
| College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 70.3% | Exceptional 72.1% |
| College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 64.6% | Exceptional 67.1% |
| Associate's Degree | Exceptional 52.4% | Exceptional 55.7% |
| Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 44.6% | Exceptional 48.3% |
| Master's Degree | Exceptional 18.5% | Exceptional 20.7% |
| Professional Degree | Exceptional 5.6% | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.2% | Exceptional 2.6% |
Immigrants from Lithuania vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.0%, a difference of 23.3%), hearing disability (2.9% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 13.3%), and male disability (10.5% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 11.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (20.5% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 0.25%), disability age 18 to 34 (5.8% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 2.2%), and disability age over 75 (44.9% compared to 46.0%, a difference of 2.5%).
| Disability Metric | Immigrants from Lithuania | Immigrants from South Central Asia |
| Disability | Exceptional 10.9% | Exceptional 9.9% |
| Males | Exceptional 10.5% | Exceptional 9.4% |
| Females | Exceptional 11.2% | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Age | Under 5 years | Fair 1.3% | Exceptional 1.0% |
| Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Exceptional 4.7% |
| Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.8% | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 9.6% | Exceptional 8.9% |
| Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 20.5% | Exceptional 20.6% |
| Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 44.9% | Exceptional 46.0% |
| Vision | Exceptional 1.9% | Exceptional 1.8% |
| Hearing | Good 2.9% | Exceptional 2.6% |
| Cognitive | Exceptional 16.0% | Exceptional 16.4% |
| Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.6% | Exceptional 5.1% |
| Self-Care | Exceptional 2.3% | Exceptional 2.2% |