Hawaiian vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 303,434,692 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South Central Asia within Hawaiian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.326. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Hawaiians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.020% in Immigrants from South Central Asia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Hawaiians corresponds to a decrease of 20.0 Immigrants from South Central Asia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($50,488 compared to $68,960, a difference of 36.6%), per capita income ($39,403 compared to $52,660, a difference of 33.6%), and median earnings ($43,673 compared to $57,114, a difference of 30.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($64,920 compared to $70,103, a difference of 8.0%), householder income under 25 years ($53,078 compared to $57,818, a difference of 8.9%), and wage/income gap (24.9% compared to 29.3%, a difference of 17.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (12.9% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 46.3%), child poverty under the age of 16 (16.4% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 31.2%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (17.4% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 31.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.1% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 2.4%), single father poverty (15.1% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 4.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.3% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 6.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.3% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 29.9%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.2% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 23.4%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 20.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.1% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 1.8%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.4% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 2.2%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.4% compared to 34.6%, a difference of 11.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.0% compared to 74.0%, a difference of 4.2%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (83.2% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 2.1%), in labor force | age 30-34 (83.0% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.7% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.7% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 35.3%), births to unmarried women (33.2% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 34.6%), and single mother households (6.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 22.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (67.4% compared to 66.4%, a difference of 1.5%), family households with children (28.7% compared to 30.0%, a difference of 4.6%), and average family size (3.41 compared to 3.23, a difference of 5.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.9% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 46.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (24.3% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 25.5%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (60.4% compared to 56.6%, a difference of 6.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.0% compared to 91.5%, a difference of 0.61%), no vehicles in household (8.0% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 6.5%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (60.4% compared to 56.6%, a difference of 6.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 79.7%), master's degree (11.6% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 78.8%), and professional degree (3.4% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 71.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (97.9% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.12%), 1st grade (97.9% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.12%), and nursery school (97.9% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.13%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (12.3% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 39.2%), hearing disability (3.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 34.1%), and male disability (12.3% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 30.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (49.2% compared to 46.0%, a difference of 7.0%), cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 7.5%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 16.4%).