Bermudan vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 54,960,873 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South Central Asia within Bermudan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.708. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Bermudans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 2.012% in Immigrants from South Central Asia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Bermudans corresponds to an increase of 2,011.6 Immigrants from South Central Asia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Bermudan and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($88,231 compared to $116,626, a difference of 32.2%), median household income ($80,406 compared to $106,057, a difference of 31.9%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($94,197 compared to $124,188, a difference of 31.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($39,418 compared to $46,324, a difference of 17.5%), householder income over 65 years ($58,171 compared to $70,103, a difference of 20.5%), and householder income under 25 years ($47,359 compared to $57,818, a difference of 22.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Bermudan and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (13.0% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 46.8%), child poverty under the age of 5 (19.2% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 45.0%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (18.0% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 43.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.9% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 13.6%), single father poverty (16.9% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 16.8%), and single male poverty (13.1% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 20.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Bermudan and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.5% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 32.3%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.7% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 31.2%), and male unemployment (5.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 24.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 2.5%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.9% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 7.5%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.6% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 8.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Bermudan and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.9% compared to 34.6%, a difference of 6.9%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.0% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.1% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 1.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.1% compared to 74.0%, a difference of 0.20%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.3% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.41%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.0% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 0.93%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Bermudan and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (35.5% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 44.0%), single mother households (7.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 34.9%), and divorced or separated (12.7% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 21.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.20 compared to 3.23, a difference of 0.96%), family households (62.2% compared to 66.4%, a difference of 6.9%), and single father households (2.1% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 8.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Bermudan and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (12.8% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 49.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (50.6% compared to 56.6%, a difference of 11.8%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (5.6% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 8.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.5% compared to 91.5%, a difference of 4.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.8% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 8.9%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (5.6% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 8.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Bermudan and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 42.5%), professional degree (4.4% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 35.3%), and master's degree (15.4% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 34.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1st grade (97.9% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.030%), 2nd grade (97.9% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.030%), and 3rd grade (97.8% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.030%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Bermudan and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (11.9% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 34.7%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.4% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 34.2%), and disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.0%, a difference of 33.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.9% compared to 46.0%, a difference of 1.9%), cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 10.8%), and hearing disability (2.9% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 11.6%).