Pima vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Community Comparison
COMPARE
Pima
Immigrants from South Central Asia
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Pima
Immigrants from South Central Asia
1,700
SOCIAL INDEX
14.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
291st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,859
SOCIAL INDEX
96.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
6th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Immigrants from South Central Asia Integration in Pima Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 60,146,661 people shows a near-perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South Central Asia within Pima communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.922. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pima within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.087% in Immigrants from South Central Asia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Pima corresponds to an increase of 86.8 Immigrants from South Central Asia.
Pima vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($30,644 compared to $52,660, a difference of 71.8%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($73,365 compared to $124,188, a difference of 69.3%), and median household income ($63,262 compared to $106,057, a difference of 67.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,503 compared to $57,818, a difference of 12.3%), median female earnings ($35,326 compared to $46,324, a difference of 31.1%), and householder income over 65 years ($50,539 compared to $70,103, a difference of 38.7%).
Income Metric | Pima | Immigrants from South Central Asia |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $30,644 | Exceptional $52,660 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $77,431 | Exceptional $125,956 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $63,262 | Exceptional $106,057 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $38,285 | Exceptional $57,114 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $42,357 | Exceptional $68,960 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $35,326 | Exceptional $46,324 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Poor $51,503 | Exceptional $57,818 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $82,821 | Exceptional $116,626 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $73,365 | Exceptional $124,188 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $50,539 | Exceptional $70,103 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 21.1% | Tragic 29.3% |
Pima vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (11.4% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 164.7%), family poverty (18.4% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 154.9%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (25.3% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 135.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (14.8% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 1.8%), single mother poverty (38.6% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 52.8%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (28.4% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 61.5%).
Poverty Metric | Pima | Immigrants from South Central Asia |
Poverty | Tragic 21.9% | Exceptional 10.2% |
Families | Tragic 18.4% | Exceptional 7.2% |
Males | Tragic 20.4% | Exceptional 9.3% |
Females | Tragic 23.6% | Exceptional 11.1% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 28.4% | Exceptional 17.6% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 25.3% | Exceptional 10.8% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 27.4% | Exceptional 13.3% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 29.0% | Exceptional 12.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 29.7% | Exceptional 12.7% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 28.2% | Exceptional 12.7% |
Single Males | Tragic 20.2% | Exceptional 10.9% |
Single Females | Tragic 30.3% | Exceptional 17.8% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 14.8% | Exceptional 14.5% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 38.6% | Exceptional 25.3% |
Married Couples | Tragic 11.4% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 19.8% | Exceptional 9.7% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 23.9% | Exceptional 11.4% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 19.0% | Exceptional 8.8% |
Pima vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (11.8% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 186.6%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (18.9% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 137.4%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (11.7% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 134.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.71%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 12.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.3% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 25.5%).
Unemployment Metric | Pima | Immigrants from South Central Asia |
Unemployment | Tragic 8.2% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Males | Tragic 8.3% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Females | Tragic 9.3% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 16.2% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 23.1% | Exceptional 16.2% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 14.2% | Excellent 10.1% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 11.8% | Exceptional 6.1% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 9.6% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 11.8% | Exceptional 4.1% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 6.4% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 6.6% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Excellent 4.8% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 6.6% | Exceptional 5.3% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 6.3% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.2% | Exceptional 8.2% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 13.4% | Exceptional 6.6% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 18.9% | Exceptional 7.9% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 11.7% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Pima vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-64 (69.0% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 16.9%), in labor force | age > 16 (57.4% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 16.8%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (72.8% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 15.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 34.6%, a difference of 1.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (69.0% compared to 74.0%, a difference of 7.2%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (79.0% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 7.7%).
Labor Participation Metric | Pima | Immigrants from South Central Asia |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 57.4% | Exceptional 67.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 69.0% | Exceptional 80.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 34.1% | Tragic 34.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 69.0% | Tragic 74.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 74.3% | Exceptional 85.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 79.0% | Exceptional 85.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 74.8% | Exceptional 85.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 72.8% | Exceptional 84.0% |
Pima vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in single father households (4.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 112.5%), births to unmarried women (51.5% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 108.6%), and single mother households (8.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 53.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.9% compared to 66.4%, a difference of 0.72%), family households with children (27.1% compared to 30.0%, a difference of 10.8%), and average family size (3.75 compared to 3.23, a difference of 16.1%).
Family Structure Metric | Pima | Immigrants from South Central Asia |
Family Households | Exceptional 65.9% | Exceptional 66.4% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 27.1% | Exceptional 30.0% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 35.6% | Exceptional 50.6% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.75 | Average 3.23 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 4.2% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 8.3% | Exceptional 5.4% |
Currently Married | Tragic 35.9% | Exceptional 50.0% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 12.9% | Exceptional 10.4% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 51.5% | Exceptional 24.7% |
Pima vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 65.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 28.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 14.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.3% compared to 91.5%, a difference of 6.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 56.6%, a difference of 8.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 14.0%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Pima | Immigrants from South Central Asia |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 14.1% | Exceptional 8.6% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 86.3% | Exceptional 91.5% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 52.0% | Exceptional 56.6% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.0% | Fair 19.3% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.9% | Fair 6.1% |
Pima vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (9.2% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 124.0%), bachelor's degree (23.2% compared to 48.3%, a difference of 108.3%), and doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 99.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 6th grade (97.2% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.040%), 5th grade (97.6% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.11%), and 4th grade (97.7% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.12%).
Education Level Metric | Pima | Immigrants from South Central Asia |
No Schooling Completed | Average 2.1% | Good 2.0% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.2% | Good 98.0% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.2% | Good 98.0% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Good 98.0% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Good 97.9% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Good 97.8% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 97.7% | Good 97.6% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Good 97.5% |
6th Grade | Excellent 97.2% | Good 97.2% |
7th Grade | Good 96.1% | Excellent 96.3% |
8th Grade | Fair 95.6% | Excellent 96.1% |
9th Grade | Tragic 93.9% | Exceptional 95.4% |
10th Grade | Tragic 91.2% | Exceptional 94.5% |
11th Grade | Tragic 88.3% | Exceptional 93.6% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 84.6% | Exceptional 92.6% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 81.6% | Exceptional 90.9% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 76.4% | Exceptional 88.4% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 51.4% | Exceptional 72.1% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 45.6% | Exceptional 67.1% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 30.2% | Exceptional 55.7% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 23.2% | Exceptional 48.3% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 9.2% | Exceptional 20.7% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.3% | Exceptional 5.9% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.3% | Exceptional 2.6% |
Pima vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (38.6% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 87.4%), vision disability (3.3% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 86.6%), and disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 82.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.0%, a difference of 3.3%), cognitive disability (18.8% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 14.8%), and disability age over 75 (55.8% compared to 46.0%, a difference of 21.4%).
Disability Metric | Pima | Immigrants from South Central Asia |
Disability | Tragic 13.7% | Exceptional 9.9% |
Males | Tragic 12.8% | Exceptional 9.4% |
Females | Tragic 14.8% | Exceptional 10.5% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.1% | Exceptional 1.0% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.2% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.7% | Exceptional 5.7% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 16.1% | Exceptional 8.9% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 38.6% | Exceptional 20.6% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 55.8% | Exceptional 46.0% |
Vision | Tragic 3.3% | Exceptional 1.8% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.7% | Exceptional 2.6% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.8% | Exceptional 16.4% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.2% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.8% | Exceptional 2.2% |