Latvian vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Community Comparison

COMPARE

Latvian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from South Central Asia
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Latvians

Immigrants from South Central Asia

Exceptional
Exceptional
9,576
SOCIAL INDEX
93.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
12th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,859
SOCIAL INDEX
96.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
6th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from South Central Asia Integration in Latvian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 213,866,758 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South Central Asia within Latvian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.113. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Latvians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.104% in Immigrants from South Central Asia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Latvians corresponds to a decrease of 103.7 Immigrants from South Central Asia.
Latvian Integration in Immigrants from South Central Asia Communities

Latvian vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($52,783 compared to $57,818, a difference of 9.5%), median household income ($97,311 compared to $106,057, a difference of 9.0%), and median male earnings ($63,498 compared to $68,960, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($52,649 compared to $52,660, a difference of 0.020%), householder income over 65 years ($67,326 compared to $70,103, a difference of 4.1%), and median family income ($120,301 compared to $125,956, a difference of 4.7%).
Latvian vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Income
Income MetricLatvianImmigrants from South Central Asia
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$52,649
Exceptional
$52,660
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$120,301
Exceptional
$125,956
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$97,311
Exceptional
$106,057
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$53,001
Exceptional
$57,114
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$63,498
Exceptional
$68,960
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$43,941
Exceptional
$46,324
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Excellent
$52,783
Exceptional
$57,818
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$108,926
Exceptional
$116,626
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$115,957
Exceptional
$124,188
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$67,326
Exceptional
$70,103
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.9%
Tragic
29.3%

Latvian vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (12.7% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 16.0%), single father poverty (16.5% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 13.5%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.5% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 10.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family poverty (7.1% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 1.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.5% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 2.2%), and female poverty (11.4% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 2.9%).
Latvian vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Poverty
Poverty MetricLatvianImmigrants from South Central Asia
Poverty
Exceptional
10.5%
Exceptional
10.2%
Families
Exceptional
7.1%
Exceptional
7.2%
Males
Exceptional
9.6%
Exceptional
9.3%
Females
Exceptional
11.4%
Exceptional
11.1%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
19.5%
Exceptional
17.6%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
11.8%
Exceptional
10.8%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
14.5%
Exceptional
13.3%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.2%
Exceptional
12.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.4%
Exceptional
12.7%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.5%
Exceptional
12.7%
Single Males
Good
12.7%
Exceptional
10.9%
Single Females
Exceptional
19.0%
Exceptional
17.8%
Single Fathers
Fair
16.5%
Exceptional
14.5%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
26.9%
Exceptional
25.3%
Married Couples
Exceptional
3.9%
Exceptional
4.3%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.5%
Exceptional
9.7%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
10.8%
Exceptional
11.4%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.1%
Exceptional
8.8%

Latvian vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 8.2%), female unemployment (4.7% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 7.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.6% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 1.1%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 1.2%), and male unemployment (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.5%).
Latvian vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Unemployment
Unemployment MetricLatvianImmigrants from South Central Asia
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
4.9%
Males
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
4.8%
Females
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
5.0%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.0%
Exceptional
11.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.7%
Exceptional
16.2%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.9%
Excellent
10.1%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Exceptional
6.1%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
4.9%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Exceptional
4.1%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Good
4.8%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Exceptional
5.3%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 75
Excellent
8.6%
Exceptional
8.2%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.8%
Exceptional
6.6%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.6%
Exceptional
7.9%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
5.0%

Latvian vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.9% compared to 34.6%, a difference of 12.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 74.0%, a difference of 2.9%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (80.5% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 0.25%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.8% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 0.28%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.4% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.49%).
Latvian vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricLatvianImmigrants from South Central Asia
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Excellent
65.5%
Exceptional
67.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.5%
Exceptional
80.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
38.9%
Tragic
34.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
76.1%
Tragic
74.0%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
86.1%
Exceptional
85.2%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
86.0%
Exceptional
85.1%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
85.4%
Exceptional
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.8%
Exceptional
84.0%

Latvian vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in family households with children (26.4% compared to 30.0%, a difference of 13.6%), births to unmarried women (27.7% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 12.3%), and divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 11.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (2.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 2.1%), single mother households (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 2.1%), and currently married (48.5% compared to 50.0%, a difference of 3.2%).
Latvian vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Family Structure
Family Structure MetricLatvianImmigrants from South Central Asia
Family Households
Tragic
62.8%
Exceptional
66.4%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.4%
Exceptional
30.0%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
47.9%
Exceptional
50.6%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.11
Average
3.23
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.0%
Exceptional
2.0%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.3%
Exceptional
5.4%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.5%
Exceptional
50.0%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.6%
Exceptional
10.4%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
27.7%
Exceptional
24.7%

Latvian vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 14.3%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.3% compared to 91.5%, a difference of 1.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.2% compared to 56.6%, a difference of 0.61%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 0.060%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 0.26%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.2% compared to 56.6%, a difference of 0.61%).
Latvian vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricLatvianImmigrants from South Central Asia
No Vehicles Available
Excellent
9.8%
Exceptional
8.6%
1+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
90.3%
Exceptional
91.5%
2+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
56.2%
Exceptional
56.6%
3+ Vehicles Available
Fair
19.3%
Fair
19.3%
4+ Vehicles Available
Fair
6.1%
Fair
6.1%

Latvian vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 29.3%), professional degree (6.2% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 5.8%), and bachelor's degree (46.1% compared to 48.3%, a difference of 4.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.50%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.51%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.51%).
Latvian vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Education Level
Education Level MetricLatvianImmigrants from South Central Asia
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.5%
Good
2.0%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.5%
Good
98.0%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.5%
Good
98.0%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Good
98.0%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Good
97.9%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Good
97.8%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Good
97.6%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Good
97.5%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Good
97.2%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.2%
Excellent
96.3%
8th Grade
Exceptional
97.0%
Excellent
96.1%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.4%
Exceptional
95.4%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.6%
Exceptional
94.5%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.7%
Exceptional
93.6%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
93.6%
Exceptional
92.6%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
92.0%
Exceptional
90.9%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
89.2%
Exceptional
88.4%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
71.6%
Exceptional
72.1%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
66.1%
Exceptional
67.1%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
53.9%
Exceptional
55.7%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
46.1%
Exceptional
48.3%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
19.8%
Exceptional
20.7%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
6.2%
Exceptional
5.9%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.6%
Exceptional
2.6%

Latvian vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.0%, a difference of 27.6%), hearing disability (3.2% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 24.0%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.8% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 20.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 1.7%), disability age over 75 (45.1% compared to 46.0%, a difference of 1.9%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.2% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 3.0%).
Latvian vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Disability
Disability MetricLatvianImmigrants from South Central Asia
Disability
Excellent
11.4%
Exceptional
9.9%
Males
Good
11.1%
Exceptional
9.4%
Females
Exceptional
11.7%
Exceptional
10.5%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.3%
Exceptional
1.0%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.4%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Poor
6.8%
Exceptional
5.7%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.2%
Exceptional
8.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.2%
Exceptional
20.6%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
45.1%
Exceptional
46.0%
Vision
Exceptional
2.0%
Exceptional
1.8%
Hearing
Tragic
3.2%
Exceptional
2.6%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.6%
Exceptional
16.4%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.7%
Exceptional
5.1%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.3%
Exceptional
2.2%