Immigrants from Uruguay vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Community Comparison
COMPARE
Immigrants from Uruguay
Immigrants from South Central Asia
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Immigrants from Uruguay
Immigrants from South Central Asia
3,806
SOCIAL INDEX
35.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
209th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,859
SOCIAL INDEX
96.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
6th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Immigrants from South Central Asia Integration in Immigrants from Uruguay Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 130,893,983 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South Central Asia within Immigrant from Uruguay communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.293. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Uruguay within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.366% in Immigrants from South Central Asia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Uruguay corresponds to a decrease of 366.2 Immigrants from South Central Asia.
Immigrants from Uruguay vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($52,860 compared to $68,960, a difference of 30.5%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($96,086 compared to $124,188, a difference of 29.2%), and median household income ($82,560 compared to $106,057, a difference of 28.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,302 compared to $57,818, a difference of 10.5%), median female earnings ($38,945 compared to $46,324, a difference of 19.0%), and wage/income gap (24.6% compared to 29.3%, a difference of 19.1%).
| Income Metric | Immigrants from Uruguay | Immigrants from South Central Asia |
| Per Capita Income | Average $43,997 | Exceptional $52,660 |
| Median Family Income | Tragic $98,205 | Exceptional $125,956 |
| Median Household Income | Poor $82,560 | Exceptional $106,057 |
| Median Earnings | Fair $45,682 | Exceptional $57,114 |
| Median Male Earnings | Poor $52,860 | Exceptional $68,960 |
| Median Female Earnings | Poor $38,945 | Exceptional $46,324 |
| Householder Age | Under 25 years | Average $52,302 | Exceptional $57,818 |
| Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Poor $91,171 | Exceptional $116,626 |
| Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Poor $96,086 | Exceptional $124,188 |
| Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $56,975 | Exceptional $70,103 |
| Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 24.6% | Tragic 29.3% |
Immigrants from Uruguay vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (12.5% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 41.8%), child poverty among boys under 16 (17.2% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 35.6%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (16.8% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 34.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.8% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 7.1%), single father poverty (15.6% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 7.4%), and single male poverty (11.9% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 8.6%).
| Poverty Metric | Immigrants from Uruguay | Immigrants from South Central Asia |
| Poverty | Poor 12.8% | Exceptional 10.2% |
| Families | Poor 9.5% | Exceptional 7.2% |
| Males | Poor 11.6% | Exceptional 9.3% |
| Females | Poor 14.0% | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 18.8% | Exceptional 17.6% |
| Females 25 to 34 years | Fair 13.7% | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Children Under 5 years | Fair 17.7% | Exceptional 13.3% |
| Children Under 16 years | Fair 16.8% | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Boys Under 16 years | Poor 17.2% | Exceptional 12.7% |
| Girls Under 16 years | Fair 16.7% | Exceptional 12.7% |
| Single Males | Exceptional 11.9% | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Single Females | Good 20.6% | Exceptional 17.8% |
| Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.6% | Exceptional 14.5% |
| Single Mothers | Average 29.1% | Exceptional 25.3% |
| Married Couples | Tragic 5.7% | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 12.8% | Exceptional 9.7% |
| Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 14.3% | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Receiving Food Stamps | Poor 12.5% | Exceptional 8.8% |
Immigrants from Uruguay vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.9% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 18.4%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 18.1%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 16.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.1% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 0.42%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.5% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 2.1%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 4.5%).
| Unemployment Metric | Immigrants from Uruguay | Immigrants from South Central Asia |
| Unemployment | Fair 5.3% | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Males | Good 5.2% | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Females | Tragic 5.5% | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Youth < 25 | Good 11.5% | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Age | 16 to 19 years | Average 17.6% | Exceptional 16.2% |
| Age | 20 to 24 years | Excellent 10.1% | Excellent 10.1% |
| Age | 25 to 29 years | Excellent 6.5% | Exceptional 6.1% |
| Age | 30 to 34 years | Good 5.3% | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Age | 35 to 44 years | Poor 4.9% | Exceptional 4.1% |
| Age | 45 to 54 years | Fair 4.6% | Exceptional 4.2% |
| Age | 55 to 59 years | Good 4.8% | Exceptional 4.6% |
| Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.1% | Exceptional 4.7% |
| Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.5% | Exceptional 5.3% |
| Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.2% | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.5% | Exceptional 8.2% |
| Women w/ Children < 6 | Average 7.7% | Exceptional 6.6% |
| Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.2% | Exceptional 7.9% |
| Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 5.9% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Immigrants from Uruguay vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (66.0% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 1.7%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 1.0%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.6% compared to 74.0%, a difference of 0.85%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.40%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.45%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.6% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.47%).
| Labor Participation Metric | Immigrants from Uruguay | Immigrants from South Central Asia |
| In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 66.0% | Exceptional 67.1% |
| In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.1% | Exceptional 80.7% |
| In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 34.4% | Tragic 34.6% |
| In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Poor 74.6% | Tragic 74.0% |
| In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Excellent 84.9% | Exceptional 85.2% |
| In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Average 84.7% | Exceptional 85.1% |
| In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Excellent 84.6% | Exceptional 85.0% |
| In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.2% | Exceptional 84.0% |
Immigrants from Uruguay vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (33.9% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 37.4%), single mother households (6.7% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 24.8%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 23.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.23 compared to 3.23, a difference of 0.040%), family households (63.9% compared to 66.4%, a difference of 4.0%), and family households with children (27.4% compared to 30.0%, a difference of 9.8%).
| Family Structure Metric | Immigrants from Uruguay | Immigrants from South Central Asia |
| Family Households | Poor 63.9% | Exceptional 66.4% |
| Family Households with Children | Fair 27.4% | Exceptional 30.0% |
| Married-couple Households | Tragic 44.5% | Exceptional 50.6% |
| Average Family Size | Average 3.23 | Average 3.23 |
| Single Father Households | Poor 2.4% | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Single Mother Households | Tragic 6.7% | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Currently Married | Tragic 45.0% | Exceptional 50.0% |
| Divorced or Separated | Tragic 12.6% | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 33.9% | Exceptional 24.7% |
Immigrants from Uruguay vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.9% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 39.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 13.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.1% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 13.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.1% compared to 91.5%, a difference of 3.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.4% compared to 56.6%, a difference of 10.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.1% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 13.0%).
| Vehicle Availability Metric | Immigrants from Uruguay | Immigrants from South Central Asia |
| No Vehicles Available | Tragic 11.9% | Exceptional 8.6% |
| 1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 88.1% | Exceptional 91.5% |
| 2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 51.4% | Exceptional 56.6% |
| 3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 17.1% | Fair 19.3% |
| 4+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 5.4% | Fair 6.1% |
Immigrants from Uruguay vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 56.0%), master's degree (15.0% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 38.4%), and professional degree (4.6% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 29.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.7% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.33%), kindergarten (97.7% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.33%), and 1st grade (97.6% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.34%).
| Education Level Metric | Immigrants from Uruguay | Immigrants from South Central Asia |
| No Schooling Completed | Tragic 2.3% | Good 2.0% |
| Nursery School | Tragic 97.7% | Good 98.0% |
| Kindergarten | Tragic 97.7% | Good 98.0% |
| 1st Grade | Tragic 97.6% | Good 98.0% |
| 2nd Grade | Tragic 97.6% | Good 97.9% |
| 3rd Grade | Tragic 97.4% | Good 97.8% |
| 4th Grade | Tragic 97.1% | Good 97.6% |
| 5th Grade | Tragic 96.9% | Good 97.5% |
| 6th Grade | Tragic 96.5% | Good 97.2% |
| 7th Grade | Tragic 95.2% | Excellent 96.3% |
| 8th Grade | Tragic 94.8% | Excellent 96.1% |
| 9th Grade | Tragic 93.8% | Exceptional 95.4% |
| 10th Grade | Tragic 92.5% | Exceptional 94.5% |
| 11th Grade | Tragic 91.3% | Exceptional 93.6% |
| 12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 90.0% | Exceptional 92.6% |
| High School Diploma | Tragic 87.6% | Exceptional 90.9% |
| GED/Equivalency | Tragic 84.4% | Exceptional 88.4% |
| College, Under 1 year | Tragic 63.4% | Exceptional 72.1% |
| College, 1 year or more | Poor 58.1% | Exceptional 67.1% |
| Associate's Degree | Fair 45.8% | Exceptional 55.7% |
| Bachelor's Degree | Average 37.8% | Exceptional 48.3% |
| Master's Degree | Average 15.0% | Exceptional 20.7% |
| Professional Degree | Good 4.6% | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.7% | Exceptional 2.6% |
Immigrants from Uruguay vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.2% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 25.2%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.0%, a difference of 19.6%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.6% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 18.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.4% compared to 46.0%, a difference of 1.0%), cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 3.7%), and hearing disability (2.7% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 6.4%).
| Disability Metric | Immigrants from Uruguay | Immigrants from South Central Asia |
| Disability | Exceptional 11.3% | Exceptional 9.9% |
| Males | Exceptional 10.8% | Exceptional 9.4% |
| Females | Exceptional 11.7% | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Age | Under 5 years | Average 1.2% | Exceptional 1.0% |
| Age | 5 to 17 years | Fair 5.6% | Exceptional 4.7% |
| Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 6.2% | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.3% | Exceptional 8.9% |
| Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 22.6% | Exceptional 20.6% |
| Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 46.4% | Exceptional 46.0% |
| Vision | Poor 2.2% | Exceptional 1.8% |
| Hearing | Exceptional 2.7% | Exceptional 2.6% |
| Cognitive | Exceptional 17.0% | Exceptional 16.4% |
| Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.9% | Exceptional 5.1% |
| Self-Care | Excellent 2.4% | Exceptional 2.2% |