Tsimshian vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Community Comparison

COMPARE

Tsimshian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from South Central Asia
Race
Ancestry
AfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBangladeshiBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCanadianCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanHaitianHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)InupiatIranianIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseKenyanKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMalaysianMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianShoshoneSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTonganTurkishUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaBangladeshBelarusBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGuatemalaGuyanaHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIrelandItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandRomaniaRussiaSerbiaSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandTaiwanThailandUkraineUruguayVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZimbabwe
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Tsimshian

Immigrants from South Central Asia

Average
Exceptional
4,927
SOCIAL INDEX
46.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
189th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,859
SOCIAL INDEX
96.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
6th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from South Central Asia Integration in Tsimshian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 15,182,857 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South Central Asia within Tsimshian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.037. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Tsimshian within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.001% in Immigrants from South Central Asia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Tsimshian corresponds to an increase of 0.9 Immigrants from South Central Asia.
Tsimshian Integration in Immigrants from South Central Asia Communities

Tsimshian vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($48,836 compared to $68,960, a difference of 41.2%), median earnings ($43,695 compared to $57,114, a difference of 30.7%), and per capita income ($40,344 compared to $52,660, a difference of 30.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,649 compared to $57,818, a difference of 5.8%), median female earnings ($39,530 compared to $46,324, a difference of 17.2%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($97,809 compared to $116,626, a difference of 19.2%).
Tsimshian vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Income
Income MetricTsimshianImmigrants from South Central Asia
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$40,344
Exceptional
$52,660
Median Family Income
Fair
$101,543
Exceptional
$125,956
Median Household Income
Fair
$83,346
Exceptional
$106,057
Median Earnings
Tragic
$43,695
Exceptional
$57,114
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$48,836
Exceptional
$68,960
Median Female Earnings
Average
$39,530
Exceptional
$46,324
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$54,649
Exceptional
$57,818
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Excellent
$97,809
Exceptional
$116,626
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Poor
$96,783
Exceptional
$124,188
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$58,202
Exceptional
$70,103
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
23.9%
Tragic
29.3%

Tsimshian vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (15.7% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 78.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (16.1% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 41.3%), and male poverty (12.8% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 38.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (11.1% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 1.5%), single mother poverty (26.8% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 6.2%), and single female poverty (19.1% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 7.3%).
Tsimshian vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Poverty
Poverty MetricTsimshianImmigrants from South Central Asia
Poverty
Tragic
13.0%
Exceptional
10.2%
Families
Good
8.8%
Exceptional
7.2%
Males
Tragic
12.8%
Exceptional
9.3%
Females
Good
13.1%
Exceptional
11.1%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
21.2%
Exceptional
17.6%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.7%
Exceptional
10.8%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
14.7%
Exceptional
13.3%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.1%
Exceptional
12.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Average
16.4%
Exceptional
12.7%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
11.5%
Exceptional
12.7%
Single Males
Exceptional
11.1%
Exceptional
10.9%
Single Females
Exceptional
19.1%
Exceptional
17.8%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
12.7%
Exceptional
14.5%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
26.8%
Exceptional
25.3%
Married Couples
Tragic
5.9%
Exceptional
4.3%
Seniors Over 65 years
Good
10.8%
Exceptional
9.7%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
16.1%
Exceptional
11.4%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
15.7%
Exceptional
8.8%

Tsimshian vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (13.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 182.5%), male unemployment (8.5% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 77.3%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (18.0% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 77.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.6% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 0.030%), female unemployment (5.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 6.7%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.3% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 6.7%).
Tsimshian vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Unemployment
Unemployment MetricTsimshianImmigrants from South Central Asia
Unemployment
Tragic
7.2%
Exceptional
4.9%
Males
Tragic
8.5%
Exceptional
4.8%
Females
Fair
5.4%
Exceptional
5.0%
Youth < 25
Tragic
16.5%
Exceptional
11.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Good
17.3%
Exceptional
16.2%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
18.0%
Excellent
10.1%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
8.0%
Exceptional
6.1%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
13.8%
Exceptional
4.9%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
6.2%
Exceptional
4.1%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Good
4.5%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.2%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Exceptional
5.3%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.5%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
10.5%
Exceptional
8.2%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.6%
Exceptional
6.6%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
11.4%
Exceptional
7.9%
Women w/ Children < 18
Poor
5.6%
Exceptional
5.0%

Tsimshian vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (77.4% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 8.5%), in labor force | age 16-19 (37.4% compared to 34.6%, a difference of 8.1%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (88.7% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 4.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.8% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.87%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.5% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (72.3% compared to 74.0%, a difference of 2.4%).
Tsimshian vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricTsimshianImmigrants from South Central Asia
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
64.5%
Exceptional
67.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
78.7%
Exceptional
80.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Excellent
37.4%
Tragic
34.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
72.3%
Tragic
74.0%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
88.7%
Exceptional
85.2%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.8%
Exceptional
85.1%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
83.5%
Exceptional
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
77.4%
Exceptional
84.0%

Tsimshian vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (42.2% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 70.8%), single father households (2.9% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 47.1%), and divorced or separated (13.3% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 27.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.25 compared to 3.23, a difference of 0.64%), family households (67.1% compared to 66.4%, a difference of 1.0%), and married-couple households (48.7% compared to 50.6%, a difference of 3.9%).
Tsimshian vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Family Structure
Family Structure MetricTsimshianImmigrants from South Central Asia
Family Households
Exceptional
67.1%
Exceptional
66.4%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
27.0%
Exceptional
30.0%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
48.7%
Exceptional
50.6%
Average Family Size
Excellent
3.25
Average
3.23
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.9%
Exceptional
2.0%
Single Mother Households
Excellent
6.0%
Exceptional
5.4%
Currently Married
Exceptional
47.7%
Exceptional
50.0%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
13.3%
Exceptional
10.4%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
42.2%
Exceptional
24.7%

Tsimshian vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 1.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 0.74%), and no vehicles in household (8.6% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 0.26%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 91.5%, a difference of 0.070%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.7% compared to 56.6%, a difference of 0.13%), and no vehicles in household (8.6% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 0.26%).
Tsimshian vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricTsimshianImmigrants from South Central Asia
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.6%
Exceptional
8.6%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
91.4%
Exceptional
91.5%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
56.7%
Exceptional
56.6%
3+ Vehicles Available
Fair
19.1%
Fair
19.3%
4+ Vehicles Available
Fair
6.2%
Fair
6.1%

Tsimshian vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 87.0%), professional degree (3.2% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 85.5%), and master's degree (11.4% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 81.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (92.9% compared to 92.6%, a difference of 0.26%), high school diploma (91.3% compared to 90.9%, a difference of 0.53%), and nursery school (98.9% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.85%).
Tsimshian vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Education Level
Education Level MetricTsimshianImmigrants from South Central Asia
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.7%
Good
2.0%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.9%
Good
98.0%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.8%
Good
98.0%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.8%
Good
98.0%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.8%
Good
97.9%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.8%
Good
97.8%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.6%
Good
97.6%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Good
97.5%
6th Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Good
97.2%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Excellent
96.3%
8th Grade
Exceptional
99.0%
Excellent
96.1%
9th Grade
Exceptional
97.0%
Exceptional
95.4%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.6%
Exceptional
94.5%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.4%
Exceptional
93.6%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.9%
Exceptional
92.6%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.3%
Exceptional
90.9%
GED/Equivalency
Excellent
86.6%
Exceptional
88.4%
College, Under 1 year
Poor
64.3%
Exceptional
72.1%
College, 1 year or more
Poor
57.9%
Exceptional
67.1%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
38.6%
Exceptional
55.7%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
28.8%
Exceptional
48.3%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.4%
Exceptional
20.7%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.2%
Exceptional
5.9%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.4%
Exceptional
2.6%

Tsimshian vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (2.4% compared to 1.0%, a difference of 134.4%), disability age 35 to 64 (16.7% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 88.8%), and hearing disability (4.7% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 82.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 5.6%), self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 20.1%), and disability age over 75 (59.2% compared to 46.0%, a difference of 28.7%).
Tsimshian vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Disability
Disability MetricTsimshianImmigrants from South Central Asia
Disability
Tragic
16.1%
Exceptional
9.9%
Males
Tragic
15.6%
Exceptional
9.4%
Females
Tragic
16.8%
Exceptional
10.5%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
2.4%
Exceptional
1.0%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
7.9%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.4%
Exceptional
5.7%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
16.7%
Exceptional
8.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
32.9%
Exceptional
20.6%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
59.2%
Exceptional
46.0%
Vision
Tragic
3.2%
Exceptional
1.8%
Hearing
Tragic
4.7%
Exceptional
2.6%
Cognitive
Average
17.3%
Exceptional
16.4%
Ambulatory
Tragic
8.8%
Exceptional
5.1%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Exceptional
2.2%