Fijian vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 53,931,407 people shows a significant negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South Central Asia within Fijian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.653. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Fijians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.104% in Immigrants from South Central Asia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Fijians corresponds to a decrease of 103.6 Immigrants from South Central Asia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Fijian and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($45,607 compared to $68,960, a difference of 51.2%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($79,956 compared to $116,626, a difference of 45.9%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($85,187 compared to $124,188, a difference of 45.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,132 compared to $57,818, a difference of 15.3%), householder income over 65 years ($56,768 compared to $70,103, a difference of 23.5%), and wage/income gap (22.9% compared to 29.3%, a difference of 28.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Fijian and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (19.9% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 50.1%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (15.9% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 47.7%), and receiving food stamps (13.0% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 47.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.8% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 3.6%), single father poverty (15.7% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 8.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 10.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Fijian and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.3% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 40.1%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (3.9% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 22.1%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (6.6% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 20.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.3% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 0.47%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.3% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.98%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.0% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Fijian and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.4% compared to 34.6%, a difference of 17.0%), in labor force | age 45-54 (80.2% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 4.7%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 74.0%, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (83.4% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 2.0%), in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 2.4%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Fijian and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 52.8%), single mother households (7.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 33.3%), and births to unmarried women (32.3% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 30.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.9% compared to 66.4%, a difference of 0.77%), family households with children (29.0% compared to 30.0%, a difference of 3.5%), and average family size (3.36 compared to 3.23, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Fijian and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 27.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 15.0%), and no vehicles in household (9.5% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 11.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.5% compared to 91.5%, a difference of 1.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.6% compared to 56.6%, a difference of 1.8%), and no vehicles in household (9.5% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 11.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Fijian and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.1% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 132.9%), professional degree (2.9% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 101.6%), and master's degree (10.3% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 101.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (97.5% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.47%), 1st grade (97.5% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.47%), and nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.48%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Fijian and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (13.2% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 49.2%), hearing disability (3.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 36.7%), and vision disability (2.4% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 33.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (49.0% compared to 46.0%, a difference of 6.7%), cognitive disability (17.7% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 8.1%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.0%, a difference of 16.0%).