Liberian vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 115,747,137 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South Central Asia within Liberian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.332. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Liberians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.172% in Immigrants from South Central Asia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Liberians corresponds to a decrease of 171.9 Immigrants from South Central Asia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Liberian and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,005 compared to $116,626, a difference of 42.2%), median household income ($75,667 compared to $106,057, a difference of 40.2%), and median male earnings ($49,318 compared to $68,960, a difference of 39.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($48,917 compared to $57,818, a difference of 18.2%), median female earnings ($38,215 compared to $46,324, a difference of 21.2%), and householder income over 65 years ($54,356 compared to $70,103, a difference of 29.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Liberian and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (14.8% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 67.6%), child poverty among girls under 16 (19.9% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 56.1%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (19.5% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 55.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.5% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 9.8%), single father poverty (16.0% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 10.3%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.6% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 17.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Liberian and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.8% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 36.5%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.2% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 24.9%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.1% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 23.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.5% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 4.7%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.8% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 6.9%), and female unemployment (5.5% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 9.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Liberian and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.8% compared to 34.6%, a difference of 21.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (78.0% compared to 74.0%, a difference of 5.4%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (86.4% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (80.9% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 0.21%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.7% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.83%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (86.1% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Liberian and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 60.1%), births to unmarried women (37.4% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 51.5%), and single father households (2.5% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 27.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.25 compared to 3.23, a difference of 0.67%), family households with children (28.3% compared to 30.0%, a difference of 6.2%), and family households (62.0% compared to 66.4%, a difference of 7.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Liberian and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (12.0% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 39.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.3% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 16.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.0% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 13.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.0% compared to 91.5%, a difference of 3.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.7% compared to 56.6%, a difference of 9.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.0% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 13.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Liberian and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 72.9%), professional degree (3.6% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 66.1%), and master's degree (12.8% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 61.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1st grade (97.6% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.38%), nursery school (97.7% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.39%), and kindergarten (97.6% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.39%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Liberian and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (12.9% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 46.0%), vision disability (2.3% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 31.5%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.0% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 26.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.0% compared to 46.0%, a difference of 4.5%), hearing disability (2.8% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 10.3%), and cognitive disability (18.6% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 13.6%).