Nicaraguan vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 273,913,852 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South Central Asia within Nicaraguan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.442. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Nicaraguans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.087% in Immigrants from South Central Asia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Nicaraguans corresponds to a decrease of 87.4 Immigrants from South Central Asia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Nicaraguan and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($49,215 compared to $68,960, a difference of 40.1%), median family income ($92,231 compared to $125,956, a difference of 36.6%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($92,554 compared to $124,188, a difference of 34.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,275 compared to $57,818, a difference of 8.5%), wage/income gap (23.4% compared to 29.3%, a difference of 25.2%), and median female earnings ($36,904 compared to $46,324, a difference of 25.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Nicaraguan and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (16.1% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 82.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (15.0% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 55.3%), and married-couple family poverty (6.7% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 55.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.1% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 2.9%), single father poverty (15.9% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 9.6%), and single male poverty (12.4% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 13.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Nicaraguan and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.4% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 18.6%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.6% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 14.0%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.6% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 13.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.3% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.37%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.2% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 0.56%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Nicaraguan and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (32.4% compared to 34.6%, a difference of 6.7%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.1% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 3.0%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.1% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.1% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 1.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.2% compared to 74.0%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.9% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Nicaraguan and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (36.6% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 48.3%), single father households (2.6% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 34.3%), and single mother households (7.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 34.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (67.4% compared to 66.4%, a difference of 1.4%), average family size (3.36 compared to 3.23, a difference of 4.1%), and family households with children (28.4% compared to 30.0%, a difference of 5.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Nicaraguan and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 13.7%), no vehicles in household (9.7% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 12.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.7% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (56.1% compared to 56.6%, a difference of 0.86%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.4% compared to 91.5%, a difference of 1.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.7% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 7.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Nicaraguan and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 75.2%), master's degree (12.5% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 66.2%), and professional degree (3.9% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 49.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.1% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.98%), kindergarten (97.0% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 1.0%), and 1st grade (97.0% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Nicaraguan and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.3% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 28.5%), self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 19.4%), and ambulatory disability (6.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 18.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (5.8% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 3.1%), cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 3.7%), and disability age over 75 (48.3% compared to 46.0%, a difference of 5.0%).