Arab vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 439,924,536 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South Central Asia within Arab communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.281. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Arabs within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.029% in Immigrants from South Central Asia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Arabs corresponds to a decrease of 29.0 Immigrants from South Central Asia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Arab and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($57,298 compared to $68,960, a difference of 20.3%), median household income ($88,398 compared to $106,057, a difference of 20.0%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($97,336 compared to $116,626, a difference of 19.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.6% compared to 29.3%, a difference of 10.3%), householder income over 65 years ($62,266 compared to $70,103, a difference of 12.6%), and householder income under 25 years ($51,219 compared to $57,818, a difference of 12.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Arab and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among boys under 16 (16.8% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 32.7%), child poverty under the age of 16 (16.6% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 32.4%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (16.8% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 31.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.2% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 7.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.8% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 11.6%), and single father poverty (16.6% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 14.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Arab and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.9% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 20.1%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 17.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.5% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 15.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 1.1%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.7%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Arab and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.8% compared to 34.6%, a difference of 6.6%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.2% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 2.8%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.4% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.6% compared to 74.0%, a difference of 0.85%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.3% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.92%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.2% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Arab and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (29.2% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 18.2%), single mother households (6.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 11.7%), and divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 11.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.23 compared to 3.23, a difference of 0.070%), family households (64.1% compared to 66.4%, a difference of 3.7%), and currently married (47.0% compared to 50.0%, a difference of 6.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Arab and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.5% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 22.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.0% compared to 56.6%, a difference of 2.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.9% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 1.3%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.6% compared to 91.5%, a difference of 2.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.9% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Arab and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 25.5%), master's degree (16.7% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 24.0%), and bachelor's degree (40.9% compared to 48.3%, a difference of 18.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.9% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.10%), kindergarten (97.9% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.10%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.10%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Arab and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.9% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 23.2%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.0%, a difference of 18.8%), and vision disability (2.1% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 17.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.1% compared to 46.0%, a difference of 2.4%), cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 5.8%), and disability age 65 to 74 (22.8% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 10.4%).