Immigrants from North America vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Community Comparison
COMPARE
Immigrants from North America
Immigrants from South Central Asia
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Immigrants from North America
Immigrants from South Central Asia
8,319
SOCIAL INDEX
80.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
78th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,859
SOCIAL INDEX
96.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
6th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Immigrants from South Central Asia Integration in Immigrants from North America Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 418,914,375 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South Central Asia within Immigrant from North America communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.207. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from North America within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.061% in Immigrants from South Central Asia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from North America corresponds to a decrease of 61.3 Immigrants from South Central Asia.
Immigrants from North America vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from North America and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($91,860 compared to $106,057, a difference of 15.4%), median male earnings ($60,265 compared to $68,960, a difference of 14.4%), and median earnings ($50,108 compared to $57,114, a difference of 14.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.4% compared to 29.3%, a difference of 3.2%), per capita income ($49,302 compared to $52,660, a difference of 6.8%), and householder income over 65 years ($64,856 compared to $70,103, a difference of 8.1%).
| Income Metric | Immigrants from North America | Immigrants from South Central Asia |
| Per Capita Income | Exceptional $49,302 | Exceptional $52,660 |
| Median Family Income | Exceptional $112,151 | Exceptional $125,956 |
| Median Household Income | Exceptional $91,860 | Exceptional $106,057 |
| Median Earnings | Exceptional $50,108 | Exceptional $57,114 |
| Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $60,265 | Exceptional $68,960 |
| Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $41,319 | Exceptional $46,324 |
| Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $53,307 | Exceptional $57,818 |
| Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $102,407 | Exceptional $116,626 |
| Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $109,198 | Exceptional $124,188 |
| Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $64,856 | Exceptional $70,103 |
| Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 28.4% | Tragic 29.3% |
Immigrants from North America vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from North America and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.9% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 20.2%), child poverty under the age of 5 (15.9% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 20.1%), and single male poverty (12.9% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 18.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.3% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 0.87%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.9% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 2.1%), and married-couple family poverty (4.5% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 3.8%).
| Poverty Metric | Immigrants from North America | Immigrants from South Central Asia |
| Poverty | Exceptional 11.3% | Exceptional 10.2% |
| Families | Exceptional 7.9% | Exceptional 7.2% |
| Males | Exceptional 10.3% | Exceptional 9.3% |
| Females | Exceptional 12.3% | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 19.5% | Exceptional 17.6% |
| Females 25 to 34 years | Excellent 12.9% | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 15.9% | Exceptional 13.3% |
| Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.6% | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.8% | Exceptional 12.7% |
| Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.9% | Exceptional 12.7% |
| Single Males | Fair 12.9% | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Single Females | Excellent 20.3% | Exceptional 17.8% |
| Single Fathers | Poor 16.6% | Exceptional 14.5% |
| Single Mothers | Excellent 28.5% | Exceptional 25.3% |
| Married Couples | Exceptional 4.5% | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 9.9% | Exceptional 9.7% |
| Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.3% | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 9.8% | Exceptional 8.8% |
Immigrants from North America vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from North America and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 15.2%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.6% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 15.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 11.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.2% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 0.14%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.19%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.53%).
| Unemployment Metric | Immigrants from North America | Immigrants from South Central Asia |
| Unemployment | Exceptional 4.9% | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Males | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Females | Exceptional 4.9% | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.2% | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.8% | Exceptional 16.2% |
| Age | 20 to 24 years | Excellent 10.2% | Excellent 10.1% |
| Age | 25 to 29 years | Average 6.6% | Exceptional 6.1% |
| Age | 30 to 34 years | Good 5.4% | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.5% | Exceptional 4.1% |
| Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Exceptional 4.2% |
| Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 4.6% |
| Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 4.7% |
| Age | 65 to 74 years | Excellent 5.3% | Exceptional 5.3% |
| Seniors > 65 | Excellent 5.1% | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.2% | Exceptional 8.2% |
| Women w/ Children < 6 | Average 7.6% | Exceptional 6.6% |
| Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Poor 9.2% | Exceptional 7.9% |
| Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 5.2% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Immigrants from North America vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from North America and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.9% compared to 34.6%, a difference of 12.6%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.7% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 5.3%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.9% compared to 74.0%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.53%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.6% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.62%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.94%).
| Labor Participation Metric | Immigrants from North America | Immigrants from South Central Asia |
| In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 63.7% | Exceptional 67.1% |
| In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 79.0% | Exceptional 80.7% |
| In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.9% | Tragic 34.6% |
| In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 75.9% | Tragic 74.0% |
| In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Good 84.8% | Exceptional 85.2% |
| In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Fair 84.6% | Exceptional 85.1% |
| In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Poor 84.2% | Exceptional 85.0% |
| In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Poor 82.5% | Exceptional 84.0% |
Immigrants from North America vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from North America and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.6% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 23.8%), divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 15.9%), and family households with children (26.6% compared to 30.0%, a difference of 13.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (48.7% compared to 50.0%, a difference of 2.6%), average family size (3.12 compared to 3.23, a difference of 3.6%), and family households (64.0% compared to 66.4%, a difference of 3.8%).
| Family Structure Metric | Immigrants from North America | Immigrants from South Central Asia |
| Family Households | Poor 64.0% | Exceptional 66.4% |
| Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.6% | Exceptional 30.0% |
| Married-couple Households | Exceptional 48.4% | Exceptional 50.6% |
| Average Family Size | Tragic 3.12 | Average 3.23 |
| Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.2% | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.6% | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Currently Married | Exceptional 48.7% | Exceptional 50.0% |
| Divorced or Separated | Average 12.1% | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Births to Unmarried Women | Excellent 30.6% | Exceptional 24.7% |
Immigrants from North America vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from North America and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 6.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.2% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 4.6%), and no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 91.5%, a difference of 0.12%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.5% compared to 56.6%, a difference of 1.6%), and no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 2.1%).
| Vehicle Availability Metric | Immigrants from North America | Immigrants from South Central Asia |
| No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.7% | Exceptional 8.6% |
| 1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 91.4% | Exceptional 91.5% |
| 2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 57.5% | Exceptional 56.6% |
| 3+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 20.2% | Fair 19.3% |
| 4+ Vehicles Available | Good 6.5% | Fair 6.1% |
Immigrants from North America vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from North America and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 21.5%), master's degree (17.2% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 20.7%), and doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 16.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (92.8% compared to 92.6%, a difference of 0.16%), high school diploma (91.0% compared to 90.9%, a difference of 0.21%), and nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.39%).
| Education Level Metric | Immigrants from North America | Immigrants from South Central Asia |
| No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.6% | Good 2.0% |
| Nursery School | Exceptional 98.4% | Good 98.0% |
| Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.4% | Good 98.0% |
| 1st Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Good 98.0% |
| 2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Good 97.9% |
| 3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Good 97.8% |
| 4th Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Good 97.6% |
| 5th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Good 97.5% |
| 6th Grade | Exceptional 97.7% | Good 97.2% |
| 7th Grade | Exceptional 96.9% | Excellent 96.3% |
| 8th Grade | Exceptional 96.7% | Excellent 96.1% |
| 9th Grade | Exceptional 96.0% | Exceptional 95.4% |
| 10th Grade | Exceptional 95.0% | Exceptional 94.5% |
| 11th Grade | Exceptional 94.0% | Exceptional 93.6% |
| 12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 92.8% | Exceptional 92.6% |
| High School Diploma | Exceptional 91.0% | Exceptional 90.9% |
| GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 87.8% | Exceptional 88.4% |
| College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 69.0% | Exceptional 72.1% |
| College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 63.0% | Exceptional 67.1% |
| Associate's Degree | Exceptional 50.1% | Exceptional 55.7% |
| Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 41.7% | Exceptional 48.3% |
| Master's Degree | Exceptional 17.2% | Exceptional 20.7% |
| Professional Degree | Exceptional 5.3% | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.2% | Exceptional 2.6% |
Immigrants from North America vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from North America and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.0%, a difference of 40.4%), hearing disability (3.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 34.2%), and male disability (11.9% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 25.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (45.7% compared to 46.0%, a difference of 0.58%), cognitive disability (16.5% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 0.83%), and disability age 65 to 74 (22.1% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 7.2%).
| Disability Metric | Immigrants from North America | Immigrants from South Central Asia |
| Disability | Tragic 12.1% | Exceptional 9.9% |
| Males | Tragic 11.9% | Exceptional 9.4% |
| Females | Fair 12.3% | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.4% | Exceptional 1.0% |
| Age | 5 to 17 years | Fair 5.7% | Exceptional 4.7% |
| Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.0% | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Age | 35 to 64 years | Good 11.0% | Exceptional 8.9% |
| Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 22.1% | Exceptional 20.6% |
| Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 45.7% | Exceptional 46.0% |
| Vision | Average 2.2% | Exceptional 1.8% |
| Hearing | Tragic 3.5% | Exceptional 2.6% |
| Cognitive | Exceptional 16.5% | Exceptional 16.4% |
| Ambulatory | Average 6.1% | Exceptional 5.1% |
| Self-Care | Exceptional 2.4% | Exceptional 2.2% |