Houma vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 35,265,599 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South Central Asia within Houma communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.359. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Houma within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.120% in Immigrants from South Central Asia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Houma corresponds to a decrease of 120.5 Immigrants from South Central Asia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Houma and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($72,093 compared to $124,188, a difference of 72.3%), median household income ($62,575 compared to $106,057, a difference of 69.5%), and median family income ($76,188 compared to $125,956, a difference of 65.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($44,356 compared to $57,818, a difference of 30.3%), wage/income gap (38.7% compared to 29.3%, a difference of 31.8%), and median male earnings ($50,547 compared to $68,960, a difference of 36.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Houma and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (23.5% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 114.7%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (22.7% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 111.3%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (26.2% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 107.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (16.2% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 42.8%), married-couple family poverty (6.4% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 48.0%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (26.2% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 48.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Houma and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (7.8% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 91.0%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (12.5% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 56.8%), and male unemployment (7.1% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 49.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 3.2%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.8% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 4.7%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 10.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Houma and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (74.1% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 13.4%), in labor force | age > 16 (59.5% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 12.7%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (72.7% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 11.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (73.7% compared to 74.0%, a difference of 0.41%), in labor force | age 16-19 (35.6% compared to 34.6%, a difference of 3.0%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (81.2% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Houma and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (46.6% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 88.6%), single father households (2.9% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 48.6%), and single mother households (7.9% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 46.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.7% compared to 66.4%, a difference of 1.1%), average family size (3.18 compared to 3.23, a difference of 1.5%), and family households with children (28.5% compared to 30.0%, a difference of 5.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Houma and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.5% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 33.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.9% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 24.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.1% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 20.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.6% compared to 91.5%, a difference of 3.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.4% compared to 56.6%, a difference of 4.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.1% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 20.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Houma and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (0.96% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 174.3%), professional degree (2.2% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 166.2%), and master's degree (7.9% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 161.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3rd grade (97.1% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.71%), 2nd grade (97.2% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.75%), and kindergarten (97.3% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.76%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Houma and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (18.7% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 111.0%), vision disability (3.4% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 92.8%), and disability age 5 to 17 (9.1% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 91.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (19.3% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 17.8%), disability age over 75 (56.2% compared to 46.0%, a difference of 22.1%), and self-care disability (3.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 36.2%).