Costa Rican vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 243,804,194 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South Central Asia within Costa Rican communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.328. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Costa Ricans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.064% in Immigrants from South Central Asia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Costa Ricans corresponds to a decrease of 63.7 Immigrants from South Central Asia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($54,279 compared to $68,960, a difference of 27.1%), median earnings ($46,645 compared to $57,114, a difference of 22.4%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($95,565 compared to $116,626, a difference of 22.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,106 compared to $57,818, a difference of 8.9%), householder income over 65 years ($61,638 compared to $70,103, a difference of 13.7%), and wage/income gap (25.3% compared to 29.3%, a difference of 16.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (11.6% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 31.4%), child poverty under the age of 16 (16.0% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 27.6%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (16.9% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 27.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.8% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 6.9%), single father poverty (16.3% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 12.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.8% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 12.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.8% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 18.7%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.7% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 13.5%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.5% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 12.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 3.2%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.5% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 3.7%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.3% compared to 34.6%, a difference of 5.1%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.2% compared to 74.0%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.26%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.6% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.65%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.3% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.79%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (32.7% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 32.5%), single mother households (6.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 20.5%), and single father households (2.3% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 19.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.9% compared to 66.4%, a difference of 0.73%), average family size (3.26 compared to 3.23, a difference of 0.86%), and family households with children (28.4% compared to 30.0%, a difference of 5.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 11.4%), no vehicles in household (9.5% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 11.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 6.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (56.9% compared to 56.6%, a difference of 0.62%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.5% compared to 91.5%, a difference of 1.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 6.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 42.3%), master's degree (15.0% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 38.4%), and professional degree (4.5% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 32.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.8% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.21%), kindergarten (97.8% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.21%), and 1st grade (97.8% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.21%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.0%, a difference of 36.4%), vision disability (2.2% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 22.0%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.7% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 21.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.9% compared to 46.0%, a difference of 2.0%), cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 4.1%), and disability age 65 to 74 (22.6% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 9.8%).