Lumbee vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 88,143,760 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South Central Asia within Lumbee communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.459. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Lumbee within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.018% in Immigrants from South Central Asia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Lumbee corresponds to a decrease of 18.4 Immigrants from South Central Asia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($54,644 compared to $106,057, a difference of 94.1%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($60,305 compared to $116,626, a difference of 93.4%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($65,113 compared to $124,188, a difference of 90.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (21.3% compared to 29.3%, a difference of 37.5%), median female earnings ($32,500 compared to $46,324, a difference of 42.5%), and median earnings ($36,876 compared to $57,114, a difference of 54.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (22.9% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 159.5%), child poverty among boys under 16 (31.9% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 152.1%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (33.3% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 151.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (43.2% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 71.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (19.7% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 73.6%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (31.1% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 76.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (13.8% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 108.7%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (11.2% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 85.7%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (13.5% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 64.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.9% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 6.6%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.6% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 7.8%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 10.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (56.8% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 18.1%), in labor force | age 20-64 (70.6% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 14.3%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (65.5% compared to 74.0%, a difference of 12.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (78.3% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 8.8%), in labor force | age 30-34 (77.3% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 10.1%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (77.0% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 10.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (48.2% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 95.3%), single mother households (9.1% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 68.6%), and single father households (2.8% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 41.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.32 compared to 3.23, a difference of 2.8%), family households (63.1% compared to 66.4%, a difference of 5.3%), and family households with children (26.3% compared to 30.0%, a difference of 14.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 43.6%), no vehicles in household (10.3% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 20.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.1% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 19.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (55.9% compared to 56.6%, a difference of 1.3%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.7% compared to 91.5%, a difference of 1.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.1% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 19.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.1% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 141.3%), professional degree (2.5% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 139.6%), and master's degree (9.3% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 123.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (96.0% compared to 96.1%, a difference of 0.080%), 7th grade (96.6% compared to 96.3%, a difference of 0.29%), and 5th grade (97.8% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.38%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (17.6% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 99.2%), vision disability (3.4% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 89.6%), and ambulatory disability (9.5% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 86.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (19.1% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 16.9%), disability age over 75 (56.2% compared to 46.0%, a difference of 22.3%), and disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.0%, a difference of 31.1%).