Yakama vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 18,889,459 people shows a significant negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South Central Asia within Yakama communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.674. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Yakama within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.165% in Immigrants from South Central Asia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Yakama corresponds to a decrease of 164.5 Immigrants from South Central Asia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Yakama and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($33,009 compared to $52,660, a difference of 59.5%), median male earnings ($45,002 compared to $68,960, a difference of 53.2%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($76,226 compared to $116,626, a difference of 53.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,321 compared to $57,818, a difference of 6.4%), wage/income gap (23.7% compared to 29.3%, a difference of 23.5%), and householder income over 65 years ($56,234 compared to $70,103, a difference of 24.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Yakama and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (21.4% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 142.5%), married-couple family poverty (9.0% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 107.9%), and family poverty (13.1% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 81.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (18.1% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 25.0%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (25.3% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 44.1%), and single mother poverty (36.4% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 44.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Yakama and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (18.4% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 124.5%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (9.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 100.3%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (8.9% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 95.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.6% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 0.27%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.9% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 24.4%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (6.6% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 24.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Yakama and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (62.1% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 7.9%), in labor force | age 35-44 (79.0% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 7.6%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (79.1% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 7.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.1% compared to 74.0%, a difference of 1.5%), in labor force | age 45-54 (80.6% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 4.3%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (80.6% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 5.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Yakama and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in single father households (4.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 113.0%), births to unmarried women (40.3% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 63.4%), and single mother households (8.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 55.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (30.8% compared to 30.0%, a difference of 2.5%), family households (69.3% compared to 66.4%, a difference of 4.4%), and average family size (3.45 compared to 3.23, a difference of 6.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Yakama and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (12.9% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 111.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (31.0% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 60.3%), and no vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 29.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.6% compared to 91.5%, a difference of 2.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (64.9% compared to 56.6%, a difference of 14.7%), and no vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 29.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Yakama and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (9.5% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 118.9%), doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 104.8%), and bachelor's degree (24.5% compared to 48.3%, a difference of 97.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.6% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 1.4%), kindergarten (96.6% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 1.4%), and 1st grade (96.5% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Yakama and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 58.4%), hearing disability (3.9% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 52.9%), and disability age 35 to 64 (13.6% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 52.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.00% compared to 1.0%, a difference of 2.9%), cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 10.7%), and disability age over 75 (51.3% compared to 46.0%, a difference of 11.5%).