Laotian vs Chilean Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 163,621,369 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Chileans within Laotian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.786. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Laotians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 1.231% in Chileans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Laotians corresponds to an increase of 1,230.7 Chileans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Laotian and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($104,993 compared to $99,900, a difference of 5.1%), median household income ($94,990 compared to $90,605, a difference of 4.8%), and median male earnings ($59,351 compared to $56,973, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.4% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 0.31%), per capita income ($47,041 compared to $46,459, a difference of 1.3%), and householder income under 25 years ($54,369 compared to $53,185, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Laotian and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.0% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 10.2%), child poverty under the age of 5 (14.7% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 5.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.6% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (11.9% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 0.50%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.2% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 0.67%), and male poverty (10.5% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Laotian and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.9% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 11.5%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.5% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 10.1%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.6% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.5% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 0.21%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.25%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.0% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 0.50%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Laotian and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.9% compared to 35.8%, a difference of 2.6%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.9% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 0.71%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.68%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.33%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.8% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 0.34%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.1% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 0.51%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Laotian and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (28.5% compared to 30.7%, a difference of 7.7%), divorced or separated (11.2% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 6.8%), and single mother households (5.8% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 5.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (2.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 0.65%), average family size (3.26 compared to 3.23, a difference of 0.87%), and currently married (47.4% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 0.93%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Laotian and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 15.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 9.2%), and no vehicles in household (9.1% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 9.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 0.97%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.6% compared to 56.1%, a difference of 4.4%), and no vehicles in household (9.1% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 9.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Laotian and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 8.9%), doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 7.2%), and bachelor's degree (42.0% compared to 41.2%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (86.5% compared to 86.6%, a difference of 0.15%), nursery school (97.8% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.19%), and kindergarten (97.8% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.19%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Laotian and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (5.1% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 5.3%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 4.5%), and vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (2.9% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 0.85%), female disability (11.4% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 1.0%), and disability (11.0% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 1.1%).