Luxembourger vs Chilean Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 103,121,515 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chileans within Luxembourger communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.223. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Luxembourgers within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.076% in Chileans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Luxembourgers corresponds to an increase of 75.9 Chileans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($50,379 compared to $53,185, a difference of 5.6%), householder income over 65 years ($60,967 compared to $63,957, a difference of 4.9%), and median household income ($86,418 compared to $90,605, a difference of 4.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($56,300 compared to $56,973, a difference of 1.2%), per capita income ($45,663 compared to $46,459, a difference of 1.7%), and median earnings ($47,640 compared to $48,504, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (3.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 27.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 20.7%), and receiving food stamps (9.1% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 20.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (28.5% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 2.3%), single female poverty (20.4% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 2.8%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (14.9% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (15.1% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 16.6%), female unemployment (4.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 16.6%), and unemployment (4.3% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 16.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 1.9%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 2.0%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (45.3% compared to 35.8%, a difference of 26.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (79.0% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 6.0%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (86.9% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (66.7% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 1.1%), in labor force | age 45-54 (85.0% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (86.4% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.6% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 10.2%), divorced or separated (11.3% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 5.4%), and currently married (49.3% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 4.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (2.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 0.69%), married-couple households (48.5% compared to 47.5%, a difference of 2.0%), and family households (63.3% compared to 65.2%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 84.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.9% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 6.0%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.1% compared to 56.1%, a difference of 5.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 3.5%), 1 or more vehicles in household (94.8% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 5.1%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.1% compared to 56.1%, a difference of 5.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 28.5%), professional degree (4.6% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 13.9%), and doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 11.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, 1 year or more (62.1% compared to 62.0%, a difference of 0.13%), nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.52%), and kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.53%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.2% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 13.0%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.9% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 8.9%), and vision disability (1.9% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 6.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (11.6% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 0.62%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 2.2%), and disability (11.3% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 2.3%).