Pima vs Chilean Community Comparison
COMPARE
Pima
Chilean
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Pima
Chileans
1,700
SOCIAL INDEX
14.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
291st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,759
SOCIAL INDEX
85.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
51st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chilean Integration in Pima Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 52,795,312 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Chileans within Pima communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.059. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pima within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.006% in Chileans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Pima corresponds to a decrease of 5.9 Chileans.
Pima vs Chilean Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Pima and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($30,644 compared to $46,459, a difference of 51.6%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($73,365 compared to $106,611, a difference of 45.3%), and median household income ($63,262 compared to $90,605, a difference of 43.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,503 compared to $53,185, a difference of 3.3%), median female earnings ($35,326 compared to $40,757, a difference of 15.4%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,821 compared to $99,900, a difference of 20.6%).
Income Metric | Pima | Chilean |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $30,644 | Exceptional $46,459 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $77,431 | Exceptional $108,429 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $63,262 | Exceptional $90,605 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $38,285 | Exceptional $48,504 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $42,357 | Exceptional $56,973 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $35,326 | Exceptional $40,757 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Poor $51,503 | Exceptional $53,185 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $82,821 | Exceptional $99,900 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $73,365 | Exceptional $106,611 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $50,539 | Exceptional $63,957 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 21.1% | Fair 26.3% |
Pima vs Chilean Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Pima and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (11.4% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 130.7%), family poverty (18.4% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 117.2%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (29.7% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 98.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (14.8% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 6.4%), single mother poverty (38.6% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 38.4%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (28.4% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 48.7%).
Poverty Metric | Pima | Chilean |
Poverty | Tragic 21.9% | Excellent 11.8% |
Families | Tragic 18.4% | Excellent 8.5% |
Males | Tragic 20.4% | Excellent 10.7% |
Females | Tragic 23.6% | Excellent 12.9% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 28.4% | Exceptional 19.1% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 25.3% | Exceptional 12.8% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 27.4% | Exceptional 15.6% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 29.0% | Exceptional 14.8% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 29.7% | Exceptional 15.0% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 28.2% | Exceptional 15.1% |
Single Males | Tragic 20.2% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Single Females | Tragic 30.3% | Exceptional 19.9% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 14.8% | Exceptional 15.7% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 38.6% | Exceptional 27.9% |
Married Couples | Tragic 11.4% | Excellent 4.9% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 19.8% | Fair 11.2% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 23.9% | Poor 12.6% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 19.0% | Excellent 11.0% |
Pima vs Chilean Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Pima and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (11.8% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 167.8%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (11.7% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 118.9%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (18.9% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 114.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.74%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 9.4%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 23.5%).
Unemployment Metric | Pima | Chilean |
Unemployment | Tragic 8.2% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Males | Tragic 8.3% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Females | Tragic 9.3% | Excellent 5.1% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 16.2% | Exceptional 11.3% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 23.1% | Average 17.6% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 14.2% | Exceptional 10.0% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 11.8% | Excellent 6.5% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 9.6% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 11.8% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 6.4% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 6.6% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Excellent 4.8% | Good 4.8% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 6.6% | Good 5.3% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 6.3% | Excellent 5.1% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.2% | Exceptional 8.4% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 13.4% | Exceptional 7.2% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 18.9% | Excellent 8.8% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 11.7% | Good 5.3% |
Pima vs Chilean Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Pima and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-64 (69.0% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 16.0%), in labor force | age > 16 (57.4% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 15.0%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (72.8% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 14.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 35.8%, a difference of 4.9%), in labor force | age 30-34 (79.0% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 7.5%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (69.0% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 8.0%).
Labor Participation Metric | Pima | Chilean |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 57.4% | Exceptional 66.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 69.0% | Exceptional 80.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 34.1% | Poor 35.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 69.0% | Poor 74.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 74.3% | Excellent 85.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 79.0% | Excellent 84.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 74.8% | Exceptional 84.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 72.8% | Exceptional 83.4% |
Pima vs Chilean Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Pima and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in single father households (4.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 88.4%), births to unmarried women (51.5% compared to 30.7%, a difference of 67.8%), and single mother households (8.3% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 35.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.9% compared to 65.2%, a difference of 1.2%), family households with children (27.1% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 3.8%), and divorced or separated (12.9% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 7.7%).
Family Structure Metric | Pima | Chilean |
Family Households | Exceptional 65.9% | Exceptional 65.2% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 27.1% | Exceptional 28.1% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 35.6% | Exceptional 47.5% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.75 | Average 3.23 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 4.2% | Exceptional 2.2% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 8.3% | Good 6.1% |
Currently Married | Tragic 35.9% | Good 47.0% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 12.9% | Good 12.0% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 51.5% | Good 30.7% |
Pima vs Chilean Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Pima and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 42.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 23.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 11.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.3% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 4.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 56.1%, a difference of 7.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 11.9%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Pima | Chilean |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 14.1% | Excellent 9.9% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 86.3% | Good 90.2% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 52.0% | Excellent 56.1% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.0% | Good 19.7% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.9% | Good 6.4% |
Pima vs Chilean Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Pima and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (9.2% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 83.1%), bachelor's degree (23.2% compared to 41.2%, a difference of 77.4%), and associate's degree (30.2% compared to 49.4%, a difference of 63.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 7th grade (96.1% compared to 96.0%, a difference of 0.090%), 8th grade (95.6% compared to 95.7%, a difference of 0.15%), and 6th grade (97.2% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.17%).
Education Level Metric | Pima | Chilean |
No Schooling Completed | Average 2.1% | Good 2.0% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.2% | Average 98.0% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.2% | Average 98.0% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Average 97.9% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Average 97.9% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Average 97.8% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 97.7% | Average 97.5% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Average 97.3% |
6th Grade | Excellent 97.2% | Average 97.1% |
7th Grade | Good 96.1% | Average 96.0% |
8th Grade | Fair 95.6% | Average 95.7% |
9th Grade | Tragic 93.9% | Good 95.0% |
10th Grade | Tragic 91.2% | Good 93.9% |
11th Grade | Tragic 88.3% | Excellent 92.9% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 84.6% | Excellent 91.7% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 81.6% | Good 89.6% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 76.4% | Excellent 86.6% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 51.4% | Exceptional 67.6% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 45.6% | Exceptional 62.0% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 30.2% | Exceptional 49.4% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 23.2% | Exceptional 41.2% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 9.2% | Exceptional 16.9% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.3% | Exceptional 5.3% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.3% | Exceptional 2.2% |
Pima vs Chilean Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Pima and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (38.6% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 75.2%), vision disability (3.3% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 60.7%), and disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 57.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.8% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 10.5%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 14.7%), and self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 19.1%).
Disability Metric | Pima | Chilean |
Disability | Tragic 13.7% | Exceptional 11.1% |
Males | Tragic 12.8% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Females | Tragic 14.8% | Exceptional 11.5% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.1% | Poor 1.3% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.2% | Exceptional 5.4% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.7% | Exceptional 6.3% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 16.1% | Exceptional 10.2% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 38.6% | Exceptional 22.0% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 55.8% | Exceptional 46.5% |
Vision | Tragic 3.3% | Exceptional 2.1% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.7% | Excellent 2.9% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.8% | Excellent 17.0% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.2% | Exceptional 5.7% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.8% | Exceptional 2.3% |