Hmong vs Chilean Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 23,011,477 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Chileans within Hmong communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.684. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Hmong within a typical geography, there is an increase of 1.363% in Chileans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Hmong corresponds to an increase of 1,363.0 Chileans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Hmong and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($38,120 compared to $46,459, a difference of 21.9%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($88,115 compared to $106,611, a difference of 21.0%), and median household income ($75,839 compared to $90,605, a difference of 19.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.7% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 5.3%), householder income under 25 years ($49,364 compared to $53,185, a difference of 7.7%), and householder income over 65 years ($56,339 compared to $63,957, a difference of 13.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Hmong and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (14.2% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 19.1%), child poverty under the age of 5 (18.5% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 19.1%), and single female poverty (23.1% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 16.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (5.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.66%), receiving food stamps (10.9% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 0.73%), and single father poverty (15.9% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Hmong and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (13.7% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 62.9%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 26.0%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 21.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.7% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 1.6%), unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.7%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.8% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Hmong and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 35.8%, a difference of 8.3%), in labor force | age 30-34 (82.4% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 3.1%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.1% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (83.7% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 1.5%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.7% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (82.6% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Hmong and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (27.7% compared to 30.7%, a difference of 10.6%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 6.9%), and single mother households (6.4% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (47.1% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 0.16%), family households (64.9% compared to 65.2%, a difference of 0.43%), and average family size (3.21 compared to 3.23, a difference of 0.67%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Hmong and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 9.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 6.5%), and no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 4.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.6% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 0.60%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.8% compared to 56.1%, a difference of 3.0%), and no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Hmong and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.7% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 40.4%), doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 37.0%), and master's degree (13.4% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 26.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.1% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.070%), 11th grade (92.8% compared to 92.9%, a difference of 0.070%), and kindergarten (98.1% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.080%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Hmong and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (13.1% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 28.4%), disability age 18 to 34 (8.1% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 27.9%), and hearing disability (3.4% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 19.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 2.8%), disability age over 75 (48.2% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 3.7%), and cognitive disability (18.4% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 8.4%).