South African vs Chilean Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 135,450,485 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Chileans within South African communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.958. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in South Africans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.545% in Chileans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 South Africans corresponds to an increase of 544.7 Chileans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between South African and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($61,460 compared to $56,973, a difference of 7.9%), per capita income ($50,044 compared to $46,459, a difference of 7.7%), and wage/income gap (28.0% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 6.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($41,825 compared to $40,757, a difference of 2.6%), householder income over 65 years ($65,652 compared to $63,957, a difference of 2.6%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($109,719 compared to $106,611, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between South African and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.1% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 10.5%), receiving food stamps (10.0% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 10.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.3% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 8.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of poverty (11.7% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 0.59%), male poverty (10.7% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 0.60%), and female poverty (12.8% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 0.79%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between South African and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.5% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 11.9%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.7% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 6.1%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 3.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.090%), unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.16%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.32%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between South African and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.7% compared to 35.8%, a difference of 2.7%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.3% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.6% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 1.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.0%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.040%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.3% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.53%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between South African and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.8% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 5.1%), single father households (2.1% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 3.6%), and family households (63.4% compared to 65.2%, a difference of 2.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (47.3% compared to 47.5%, a difference of 0.57%), births to unmarried women (30.5% compared to 30.7%, a difference of 0.57%), and divorced or separated (11.8% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between South African and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 3.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 3.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (56.2% compared to 56.1%, a difference of 0.19%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.0% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 0.21%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between South African and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.8% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 16.1%), doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 8.7%), and professional degree (5.7% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 8.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.30%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.30%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.31%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between South African and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 14.5%), hearing disability (3.1% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 7.2%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.7% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 4.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (21.9% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 0.39%), self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 0.61%), and cognitive disability (16.9% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 0.63%).