Crow vs Chilean Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 47,112,329 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Chileans within Crow communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.736. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Crow within a typical geography, there is an increase of 1.674% in Chileans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Crow corresponds to an increase of 1,674.1 Chileans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Crow and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($31,729 compared to $46,459, a difference of 46.4%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($74,257 compared to $106,611, a difference of 43.6%), and median household income ($63,681 compared to $90,605, a difference of 42.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($47,012 compared to $53,185, a difference of 13.1%), median female earnings ($35,266 compared to $40,757, a difference of 15.6%), and median earnings ($38,707 compared to $48,504, a difference of 25.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Crow and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (31.0% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 99.0%), single male poverty (23.3% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 95.2%), and married-couple family poverty (9.6% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 93.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (13.4% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 22.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.9% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 26.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (15.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 36.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Crow and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (15.7% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 257.7%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (16.9% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 232.3%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (17.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 228.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 2.9%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 4.8%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.9% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 25.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Crow and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 30-34 (75.9% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 11.9%), in labor force | age 35-44 (76.5% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 10.8%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (73.3% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 9.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.9% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 3.2%), in labor force | age 45-54 (78.3% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 6.5%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (38.5% compared to 35.8%, a difference of 7.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Crow and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 58.6%), births to unmarried women (40.4% compared to 30.7%, a difference of 31.6%), and single mother households (7.4% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 21.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.3% compared to 65.2%, a difference of 0.20%), family households with children (27.4% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 2.8%), and married-couple households (41.4% compared to 47.5%, a difference of 14.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Crow and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 21.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.5% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 14.1%), and no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 11.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (55.7% compared to 56.1%, a difference of 0.68%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.3% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 0.98%), and no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 11.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Crow and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 66.5%), master's degree (10.6% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 59.3%), and bachelor's degree (27.7% compared to 41.2%, a difference of 48.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.9% compared to 92.9%, a difference of 0.020%), 10th grade (94.7% compared to 93.9%, a difference of 0.84%), and 9th grade (96.1% compared to 95.0%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Crow and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.2% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 45.2%), disability age 35 to 64 (14.6% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 42.8%), and disability age 18 to 34 (8.3% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 31.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.23%), cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 1.9%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 3.4%).