Chickasaw vs Chilean Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 104,104,015 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chileans within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.204. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.025% in Chileans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to an increase of 24.5 Chileans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,193 compared to $106,611, a difference of 29.7%), median household income ($70,005 compared to $90,605, a difference of 29.4%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($77,929 compared to $99,900, a difference of 28.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 3.3%), median female earnings ($34,414 compared to $40,757, a difference of 18.4%), and householder income under 25 years ($44,763 compared to $53,185, a difference of 18.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (21.8% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 40.1%), single male poverty (16.3% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 36.9%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.0% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 33.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 4.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 8.6%), and married-couple family poverty (5.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 17.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.0% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 24.7%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 19.4%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 15.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.20%), female unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.31%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.9% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 0.59%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 35.8%, a difference of 7.2%), in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 6.0%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 5.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 0.080%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 3.7%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.8% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 24.2%), divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 18.8%), and births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 30.7%, a difference of 18.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.2% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 0.31%), currently married (46.6% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 0.84%), and family households (64.4% compared to 65.2%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 25.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 16.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 12.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 2.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 56.1%, a difference of 5.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 12.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 56.4%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 48.3%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 42.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (94.1% compared to 93.9%, a difference of 0.16%), nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.39%), and kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.41%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 57.3%), hearing disability (4.5% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 56.1%), and vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 53.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 8.7%), disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 10.2%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 22.4%).