Taiwanese vs Chilean Community Comparison
COMPARE
Taiwanese
Chilean
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Taiwanese
Chileans
6,532
SOCIAL INDEX
62.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
151st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,759
SOCIAL INDEX
85.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
51st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chilean Integration in Taiwanese Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 29,937,803 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chileans within Taiwanese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.381. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Taiwanese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.498% in Chileans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Taiwanese corresponds to an increase of 498.3 Chileans.
Taiwanese vs Chilean Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Taiwanese and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($49,804 compared to $53,185, a difference of 6.8%), wage/income gap (25.1% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 4.6%), and median male earnings ($55,556 compared to $56,973, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($46,455 compared to $46,459, a difference of 0.010%), median female earnings ($40,576 compared to $40,757, a difference of 0.45%), and median household income ($89,900 compared to $90,605, a difference of 0.78%).
Income Metric | Taiwanese | Chilean |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $46,455 | Exceptional $46,459 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $107,295 | Exceptional $108,429 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $89,900 | Exceptional $90,605 |
Median Earnings | Excellent $47,902 | Exceptional $48,504 |
Median Male Earnings | Good $55,556 | Exceptional $56,973 |
Median Female Earnings | Excellent $40,576 | Exceptional $40,757 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $49,804 | Exceptional $53,185 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $101,492 | Exceptional $99,900 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Excellent $104,180 | Exceptional $106,611 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Excellent $62,894 | Exceptional $63,957 |
Wage/Income Gap | Excellent 25.1% | Fair 26.3% |
Taiwanese vs Chilean Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Taiwanese and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.2% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 11.2%), single father poverty (14.3% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 9.6%), and single male poverty (10.9% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 9.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.15%), receiving food stamps (11.0% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 0.59%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.6% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 0.61%).
Poverty Metric | Taiwanese | Chilean |
Poverty | Good 12.2% | Excellent 11.8% |
Families | Exceptional 8.2% | Excellent 8.5% |
Males | Good 11.0% | Excellent 10.7% |
Females | Good 13.1% | Excellent 12.9% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 21.2% | Exceptional 19.1% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 11.8% | Exceptional 12.8% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 14.5% | Exceptional 15.6% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.5% | Exceptional 14.8% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.8% | Exceptional 15.0% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.6% | Exceptional 15.1% |
Single Males | Exceptional 10.9% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Single Females | Exceptional 19.4% | Exceptional 19.9% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 14.3% | Exceptional 15.7% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 27.5% | Exceptional 27.9% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.8% | Excellent 4.9% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Fair 11.2% | Fair 11.2% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Poor 12.6% | Poor 12.6% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Excellent 11.0% | Excellent 11.0% |
Taiwanese vs Chilean Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Taiwanese and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (6.5% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 36.6%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (6.6% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 28.4%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (6.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 18.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 0.14%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.6% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 1.3%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 2.7%).
Unemployment Metric | Taiwanese | Chilean |
Unemployment | Average 5.3% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Males | Fair 5.3% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Females | Average 5.3% | Excellent 5.1% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 10.8% | Exceptional 11.3% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 15.5% | Average 17.6% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.4% | Exceptional 10.0% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.1% | Excellent 6.5% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Good 5.3% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Good 4.5% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.6% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.3% | Good 4.8% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 6.3% | Good 5.3% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 6.0% | Excellent 5.1% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 6.6% | Exceptional 8.4% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.1% | Exceptional 7.2% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 6.5% | Excellent 8.8% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 4.8% | Good 5.3% |
Taiwanese vs Chilean Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Taiwanese and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.8% compared to 35.8%, a difference of 5.7%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.4% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.56%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.6% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.46%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 0.020%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.2% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 0.16%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.2% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 0.28%).
Labor Participation Metric | Taiwanese | Chilean |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 66.2% | Exceptional 66.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.2% | Exceptional 80.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 33.8% | Poor 35.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Fair 74.7% | Poor 74.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 85.4% | Excellent 85.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Fair 84.6% | Excellent 84.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 85.1% | Exceptional 84.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.4% | Exceptional 83.4% |
Taiwanese vs Chilean Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Taiwanese and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.8% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 6.4%), births to unmarried women (29.0% compared to 30.7%, a difference of 5.9%), and family households with children (26.7% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 5.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.23 compared to 3.23, a difference of 0.020%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 0.83%), and currently married (45.8% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 2.7%).
Family Structure Metric | Taiwanese | Chilean |
Family Households | Tragic 63.3% | Exceptional 65.2% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.7% | Exceptional 28.1% |
Married-couple Households | Fair 45.9% | Exceptional 47.5% |
Average Family Size | Average 3.23 | Average 3.23 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.2% | Exceptional 2.2% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.8% | Good 6.1% |
Currently Married | Poor 45.8% | Good 47.0% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.5% | Good 12.0% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 29.0% | Good 30.7% |
Taiwanese vs Chilean Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Taiwanese and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.7% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 17.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 9.7%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (53.9% compared to 56.1%, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (20.0% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 1.7%), 1 or more vehicles in household (88.4% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 2.0%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (53.9% compared to 56.1%, a difference of 4.2%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Taiwanese | Chilean |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 11.7% | Excellent 9.9% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 88.4% | Good 90.2% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 53.9% | Excellent 56.1% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 20.0% | Good 19.7% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.0% | Good 6.4% |
Taiwanese vs Chilean Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Taiwanese and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.5% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 22.1%), professional degree (5.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 5.6%), and master's degree (16.1% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (97.5% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.44%), nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.45%), and 1st grade (97.5% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.45%).
Education Level Metric | Taiwanese | Chilean |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 2.5% | Good 2.0% |
Nursery School | Tragic 97.6% | Average 98.0% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 97.5% | Average 98.0% |
1st Grade | Tragic 97.5% | Average 97.9% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 97.4% | Average 97.9% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 97.3% | Average 97.8% |
4th Grade | Tragic 97.0% | Average 97.5% |
5th Grade | Tragic 96.7% | Average 97.3% |
6th Grade | Tragic 96.5% | Average 97.1% |
7th Grade | Tragic 94.8% | Average 96.0% |
8th Grade | Tragic 94.7% | Average 95.7% |
9th Grade | Tragic 93.6% | Good 95.0% |
10th Grade | Tragic 92.5% | Good 93.9% |
11th Grade | Tragic 91.3% | Excellent 92.9% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 90.0% | Excellent 91.7% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 87.9% | Good 89.6% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 84.7% | Excellent 86.6% |
College, Under 1 year | Good 66.4% | Exceptional 67.6% |
College, 1 year or more | Excellent 60.7% | Exceptional 62.0% |
Associate's Degree | Excellent 47.7% | Exceptional 49.4% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 40.0% | Exceptional 41.2% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 16.1% | Exceptional 16.9% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 5.3% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.1% | Exceptional 2.2% |
Taiwanese vs Chilean Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Taiwanese and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (4.9% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 9.4%), vision disability (1.9% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 7.5%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.0% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (11.4% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 1.1%), ambulatory disability (5.6% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 2.3%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 2.4%).
Disability Metric | Taiwanese | Chilean |
Disability | Exceptional 10.8% | Exceptional 11.1% |
Males | Exceptional 10.3% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Females | Exceptional 11.4% | Exceptional 11.5% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.3% | Poor 1.3% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 4.9% | Exceptional 5.4% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 6.0% | Exceptional 6.3% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 9.8% | Exceptional 10.2% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Excellent 22.7% | Exceptional 22.0% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 48.2% | Exceptional 46.5% |
Vision | Exceptional 1.9% | Exceptional 2.1% |
Hearing | Exceptional 2.8% | Excellent 2.9% |
Cognitive | Tragic 17.6% | Excellent 17.0% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.6% | Exceptional 5.7% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.4% | Exceptional 2.3% |