Australian vs Chilean Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 154,660,488 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chileans within Australian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.378. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Australians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.069% in Chileans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Australians corresponds to an increase of 68.9 Chileans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Australian and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($52,074 compared to $46,459, a difference of 12.1%), median male earnings ($62,857 compared to $56,973, a difference of 10.3%), and median family income ($118,440 compared to $108,429, a difference of 9.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,739 compared to $53,185, a difference of 1.0%), householder income over 65 years ($66,891 compared to $63,957, a difference of 4.6%), and median female earnings ($43,308 compared to $40,757, a difference of 6.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Australian and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 14.7%), receiving food stamps (9.6% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 14.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.9% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 12.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.7% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 0.080%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.8% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 0.32%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (15.5% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 0.53%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Australian and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (4.9% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 4.9%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.6% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 4.4%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.11%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 0.28%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.31%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Australian and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.8% compared to 35.8%, a difference of 5.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.5% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.5% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 1.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.080%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.12%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.3% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.52%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Australian and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.6% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 10.0%), family households with children (26.9% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 4.5%), and births to unmarried women (29.5% compared to 30.7%, a difference of 3.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (47.4% compared to 47.5%, a difference of 0.35%), divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 0.63%), and currently married (47.6% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Australian and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 2.5%), no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 2.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.0% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 0.16%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.7% compared to 56.1%, a difference of 1.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Australian and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 26.2%), professional degree (5.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 12.0%), and doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 11.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.46%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.46%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.47%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Australian and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.2% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 10.3%), disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 7.7%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.8% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 7.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (22.0% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 0.050%), vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 0.65%), and ambulatory disability (5.8% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 0.66%).