African vs Chilean Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 242,507,367 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chileans within African communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.040. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Africans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.001% in Chileans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Africans corresponds to an increase of 0.9 Chileans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between African and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($78,986 compared to $99,900, a difference of 26.5%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($84,925 compared to $106,611, a difference of 25.5%), and median household income ($72,650 compared to $90,605, a difference of 24.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($36,530 compared to $40,757, a difference of 11.6%), householder income under 25 years ($46,838 compared to $53,185, a difference of 13.6%), and wage/income gap (22.9% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 14.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between African and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (22.8% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 46.5%), child poverty under the age of 16 (21.7% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 46.3%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (21.9% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 45.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.6% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 7.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.6% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 12.8%), and single father poverty (18.3% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 16.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between African and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.2% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 27.5%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.6% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 27.3%), and male unemployment (6.3% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 24.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 2.8%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 3.2%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between African and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 35.8%, a difference of 6.2%), in labor force | age 45-54 (80.5% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 3.6%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.9% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.0% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 0.61%), in labor force | age 30-34 (83.4% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.2% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between African and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.2% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 33.4%), births to unmarried women (39.7% compared to 30.7%, a difference of 29.4%), and married-couple households (40.9% compared to 47.5%, a difference of 16.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.25 compared to 3.23, a difference of 0.73%), family households with children (27.2% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 3.6%), and family households (62.1% compared to 65.2%, a difference of 4.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between African and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (12.3% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 24.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 9.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 8.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.8% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 2.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.8% compared to 56.1%, a difference of 8.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 8.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between African and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.7% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 43.2%), doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 37.2%), and master's degree (12.9% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 31.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1st grade (97.8% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.14%), nursery school (97.9% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.15%), and kindergarten (97.8% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.15%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between African and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (13.6% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 32.7%), vision disability (2.5% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 22.5%), and ambulatory disability (7.0% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 21.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.9% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 5.1%), hearing disability (3.0% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 6.2%), and disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 6.9%).