Hawaiian vs Chilean Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 195,092,101 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Chileans within Hawaiian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.427. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Hawaiians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.011% in Chileans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Hawaiians corresponds to an increase of 11.1 Chileans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($39,403 compared to $46,459, a difference of 17.9%), median male earnings ($50,488 compared to $56,973, a difference of 12.8%), and median earnings ($43,673 compared to $48,504, a difference of 11.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,078 compared to $53,185, a difference of 0.20%), householder income over 65 years ($64,920 compared to $63,957, a difference of 1.5%), and wage/income gap (24.9% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 5.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (12.9% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 17.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.1% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 13.9%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (17.4% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 11.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.7% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 2.1%), married-couple family poverty (5.1% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 4.0%), and single father poverty (15.1% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 21.3%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.2% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 13.5%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.9% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 13.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.9% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 1.9%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 2.3%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.4% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.4% compared to 35.8%, a difference of 7.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.0% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 3.4%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.0% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (78.7% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 1.8%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.2% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.7% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 20.0%), births to unmarried women (33.2% compared to 30.7%, a difference of 8.3%), and single mother households (6.6% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 7.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (47.8% compared to 47.5%, a difference of 0.66%), divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 0.79%), and currently married (46.6% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 0.82%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.9% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 39.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (24.3% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 23.2%), and no vehicles in household (8.0% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 23.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.0% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 2.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.4% compared to 56.1%, a difference of 7.6%), and no vehicles in household (8.0% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 23.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 52.7%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 47.1%), and master's degree (11.6% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 46.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.9% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.090%), kindergarten (97.9% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.090%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.090%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.5% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 20.6%), disability age 35 to 64 (12.3% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 20.5%), and disability age 65 to 74 (25.5% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 15.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 2.4%), cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 3.4%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 5.1%).